Page 6 - COVID-19 Fact Finding Plandemic 05102020 (Beers)

Dean A. Beers, CLI and Karen S. Beers, BSW

Fact Finding Research - Govermedia COVID-19 Plandemic Misinformation
May 10, 2020
Page 6 of 18

- Financial and Professional Institutions
- Providers of Basic Necessities to Economically Disadvantaged Populations
- Construction
- Defense
- Critical Services Necessary to Maintain the Safety, Sanitation and Critical Operations of Residences or
- Other Critical Businesses
- Vendors that Provide Critical Services or Products, Including Logistics and Technology Support, Child
Care and Services
- Educational Institutions that Provide Critical Services to Students and the General Public
- Critical Government Functions

Previous orders had identified and defined other essential businesses, operations, and employees; and
required workforce reduction by 50% of the employees (i.e. staggered hours, etc.).

Executive orders have variously extended the Stay at Home orders, and operations of businesses. These
orders have also further tightened the parameters of business operations and customer interactions.

IX. Independent Research and Findings
As we are not, and have never claimed to be, any actuarial or disease expert, our predictions are based
on US mid-April declines and end of May event end; except those trailing reported infections and deaths
resulting from existing, incubation period of two weeks, and trailing infections.

• Prior to 03/16/2020 the UK reported, “…almost no social-isolation measures in place, and
according to some reports, the government planned to let the virus run its course through
the population, with the exception of the elderly, who were to be kept indoors. The idea was
to let enough people get sick and recover from the mild version of the disease, to create
14
‘herd immunity.”
• On or about 03/16/2020 Neil Ferguson, the UK expert (and ‘flatten the curve’ social
15
distancing and suppression) – http://www.imperial.ac.uk/media/imperial-
college/medicine/sph/ide/gida-fellowships/Imperial-College-COVID19-NPI-modelling-16-03-
2020.pdf; this study is the basis for all international responses, including federal and
Colorado. The UK immediately abandoned their initial plan, and immediately adapted the
suppression recommendations of Ferguson. This report was based on reported infections
and deaths from the COVID-19 point of origination in Wuhan, China – knowing this
information, or information from China, was unreliable; and the demographic differences to
the UK, EU, and US were dramatically different.
o In his report, he makes “a baseline assumption that R0=2.4 but examine values between 2.0 and
2.6.” [emphasis added]
o Ferguson recommended two fundamental strategies: 1) mitigation – “which focuses on slowing
but not necessarily stopping epidemic spread – reducing peak healthcare demand while
protecting those most at risk of severe disease from infection”; and 2) suppression – “which aims
to reverse epidemic growth, reducing case numbers to low levels and maintaining that situation
indefinitely.” [emphasis added]

14 https://www.theatlantic.com/technology/archive/2020/04/coronavirus-models-arent-supposed-be-right/609271/
15 http://www.imperial.ac.uk/media/imperial-college/medicine/sph/ide/gida-fellowships/Imperial-College-COVID19-NPI-modelling-16-03-
2020.pdf

Copyright © 2020 by Dean A. Beers and Karen S. Beers – written permission required for any use.