Page 81 - W01TB8_2017-18_[low-res]_F2F_Neat
P. 81

Chapter 5 Good faith                                                                           5/3



               A     Principle of utmost good faith


               ‘Utmost good faith’ can be defined as:
                  a positive duty voluntarily to disclose, accurately and fully, all facts material to the risk being proposed,
                  whether requested or not.

               As stated in the introduction, the pre-contractual information duty has changed as a result of the
                                                                                                   Proposer has duty to
               Consumer Insurance (Disclosure and Representations) Act 2012 (CIDRA) in consumer insurance and the  disclose all material
               Insurance Act 2015 (IA 2015) in non-consumer insurance.                             facts about the risk
               The principle does, however, continue to apply equally to both the proposer and the insurer
               throughout the contract relationship, in the form of the duty to act openly, honestly and in fair dealing
               (see section D3 for more detail on how this affects the duty of the insurer).


               B     Duty of disclosure

               It is useful to compare insurance contracts with contracts for the sale of goods.
               Contracts for the sale of goods are subject to the doctrine of ‘caveat emptor’ (let the buyer beware).

               Although the buyer of goods is given considerable protection by statutes such as the Sale of Goods Act
               1979 and the Unfair Contract Terms Act 1977 (which applies to commercial contracts generally but not to
               insurance), the basic responsibility of each party is still to make sure that they make a good bargain.
               This is largely because the buyer is able to examine the goods, assess their quality, and judge for   Chapter
               themselves whether the price is fair. Therefore, so long as neither party deliberately misleads the other,
               and any questions are answered truthfully, the contract cannot be avoided simply because one party    5
               finds that they have made a poor bargain. In particular, neither party is required to disclose information
               that is not requested.
                Example 5.1
                This means, for example, that if you are selling a car you are under no positive duty to disclose anything about it to
                the buyer (although, of course, if you do give information it must be correct).                  Reference copy for CII Face to Face Training


               B1 Proposer’s duty of disclosure in non-consumer (business) insurance

               In business insurance there is a positive duty of disclosure going beyond a mere duty not to
               misrepresent matters which are, in fact, disclosed.

               The Insurance Act 2015 modified the duty of utmost good faith that underlies insurance contracts by
               introducing the new duty of ‘fair presentation’. The duty to volunteer information is retained and a
               commercial proposer must either:
               • disclose to insurers ‘every material circumstance’ which the proposer knows or ought to know; or
               • provide the insurer with sufficient information to show a prudent insurer that it needs to make further
                 enquiries into those ‘material circumstances’.
               The disclosure should be in a matter which would be reasonably clear and accessible to a prudent
                                                                                                   IA 2015 introduced
               insurer, and material representations relating to fact should be substantially correct and those relating  new duty of ‘fair
                                                                                                   presentation’
               to a matter of expectation or belief should be made in good faith.
               The key changes are that:
               • the proposer cannot ‘data dump’ on the insurer – the presentation must be reasonably clear and
                 accessible; and
               • the insurer has to consider whether the presentation invites further questions to be asked, and it has
                 the burden to make sure those questions are asked if needed.
               The Act also sets out what the measure of the proposer’s actual or imputed knowledge is, and it will
               include matters known by senior management in an organisation as well as those responsible for the
               organisation’s insurances (including the brokers) – although this does not include any confidential
               information which might be held by their broker, for example, which they did not obtain from their
               clients.
   76   77   78   79   80   81   82   83   84   85   86