Page 118 - M97TB9_2018-19_[low-res]_F2F_Neat2
P. 118

5/12          M97/February 2018  Reinsurance




                        A2B Advantages and disadvantages of stop loss treaties
                        Advantages
                        As we saw in example 5.9, stop loss reinsurance guarantees to meet retained losses which exceed a
         Gives the insurer a
         degree of certainty  pre-agreed percentage or amount of the insurer’s net retained income up to a further predetermined
         that its overall claims  percentage or amount. It, therefore, gives the insurer a degree of certainty that its overall claims
         experience will be
         capped         experience will be capped at a pre-selected loss ratio assuming, of course, that it has purchased
                        sufficient reinsurance protection.
                        Disadvantages
                        Stop loss is unlikely to be available for motor and liability types because the long-tail nature of claims
                        makes it difficult to take a view on how the account protected has actually performed in the short- to
                        medium-term. Furthermore, the insurer’s options are limited because cover is usually only applied to
                        losses in excess of 100% of premium income and so a substantial loss has to be sustained before
                        reinsurance protection becomes effective. Cover is also applied with an upper limit and sometimes with
                        co-insurance. There is a limited market for stop loss and it may only be available for certain types of risk,
                        such as crop hail insurance.

                         Co-insurance
                         Where cover is applied with co-insurance, the insurer participates in the loss which would otherwise have been
                         wholly passed to the reinsurer. The use of co-insurance is expressed, for example, as follows:
                         90% of 50% of GNRPI excess of 105% GNRPI
                         Here, the insurer contributes 10% to the reinsurer’s exposure in the range of 0-50% of losses greater than 105% of
    5                    the insurer’s GNRPI.
    Chapter


                        A3 Aggregate excess of loss treaty

                        While stop loss operates based on pre-agreed percentages, aggregate excess of loss cover has limits
         A form of excess of
         loss reinsurance  that are expressed only as fixed amounts. The similarity is that both set out to limit or reduce the
                        aggregation of claims within predetermined boundaries over a period of time, usually annually.  Reference copy for CII Face to Face Training
                        Aggregate excess of loss is a form of excess of loss reinsurance that covers the aggregate of losses,
                        above an excess point and subject to an upper limit, sustained from a single event or from a defined
                        peril, or perils, over a defined period, usually one year. In essence, it is an excess of loss treaty
                        reinsurance under which the reinsurer responds when a reinsured incurs losses on a particular line of
                        business during a specified period in excess of a stated amount.

                        Aggregate excess of loss contract limits are expressed in monetary terms, say, $2.5m in the aggregate
                        excess of $5.25m in the aggregate and all losses affecting the account are aggregated to ascertain any
                        potential excess of loss recovery against those contract limits.

                         Example 5.10
                         The reinsurer indemnifies a US insurance company for an aggregate, or cumulative, amount of losses in excess of a
                         specified aggregate amount. This can be written excess of $1m in the aggregate excess of $1m in the aggregate.
                         There might also be an inner deductible to apply only to losses excess of a stated dollar amount. This would be
                         expressed as $1m in the aggregate excess of $1m in the aggregate applying only to losses greater than $100,000
                         per loss.

                        A3A Use of aggregate excess of loss treaties

                        They would be used to protect the insurer’s net absolute retained account against attritional losses that
                        are relatively small in size but have a potentially substantial impact on overall loss ratios.

                        A3B Advantages and disadvantages of aggregate excess of loss treaties

                        Advantages
                        Aggregate excess of loss treaties provide a corridor of protection over the insurer’s expected results in
         Provides a corridor of
         protection     exchange for a fixed premium. In addition, they may incorporate refunds in premium if the insurer
                        delivers good results to the reinsurer. They provide aggregate protection of underwriting results. Finally,
                        they ‘take the sting out of’ an above-average net loss ratio.
   113   114   115   116   117   118   119   120   121   122   123