Page 13 - 1 One Simple Question
P. 13

communication  is  important.  However,  it’s  often  just  as  important,  to  know  who  NOT  to
               communicate with.


               During our CHAMP certification training course, we spend a lot of time discussing the importance

               of knowing and understanding the roles and relationships that control a workers’ compensation
               claim assignment. For someone that doesn’t spend a lot of time in the workers’ compensation
               industry, it can be a bit confusing and overwhelming. In order to keep it as simple as possible, we

               suggest that the provider always know the answer to one simple question; “Who has the authority
               to authorize?” Ultimately, on any file, there is a person that has the ultimate authority to authorize

               a product or service. Unless otherwise instructed, that person becomes the initial recipient of all
               communication and documentation. That person can then share the information to the appropriate
               parties,  or  they  can  provide  instruction  to  the  provider  as  to  who  should  be  copied  on

               communication. That person should also provide instruction to the provider as to how they prefer
               to be communicated with, and how often. If you are a provider, ask who has the authority to
               authorize. If you are a carrier, help the provider by making it clear who the point person is that

               they should be communicating with.


               When it comes to when and how to communicate, like most things in workers’ comp, the answer
               is “it depends”. While there is no definitive standard established, the following is part of the best
               practice policy we teach and a pretty good place to start. I believe the best results are achieved

               by  a  collaborative  process  of  experts  with  specialized  skills,  all  working  toward  a  common
               outcome objective.


               Home modification projects are completed by a three-phase process. Phase one is the home
               assessment  that  should  lead  to  an  agreed  scope  of  work.  The  second  phase  is  obtaining  a

               reasonable  cost  for  the  agreed  scope  of  work.  And  the  third  phase  is  the  completion  of  the
               construction of the modifications.


               For phase one, documentation should include a detailed home assessment report that justifies
               the  recommended  modifications  based  on  medical  necessity.  The  assessment  is  the  key

               document that supports the authorization and denial of modifications. While the written report is
               a key document, there are many other conversations that take place before the final scope is

               agreed upon. Those conversations should be documented and stored for future reference.

               Phase two is the development of the reasonable price for the agreed scope of work. The key

               document during this phase is the contractor’s estimate. How the estimate is submitted depends

                                                                                                           11
   8   9   10   11   12   13   14   15   16   17   18