Page 6 - Luce 2020
P. 6

P oint of  View





          continued from page 4            Respiratory virus, the very bad one   Did the pandemic change your thoughts
                                           which kills about 30% of people, which   on how we do research? And was there
          along, we switch immediately. But many   is still circulating, came via camels. The   anything we could have done better or
          people in the broader community are not  SARS-CoV-2, the one that’s circulating   differently?
          accustomed to changing their mind at all.  now, the closest virus that’s been
                                           found outside bats is in pangolins. The   Making drugs ahead of time would have
          There was a book written years ago, the   identical virus hasn’t been found. So,   been really important. With vaccines,
          title of which I truly loathed: Everything   there are three bad viruses, but there are   whatever product you make is very
          I need to know I learnt in kindergarten.   also two more common cold viruses that   specific for the invading virus. And
          I think there are a lot of people out   have come over in the last twenty years.   pandemics are going to be caused by
          there who haven’t learnt anything since                            viruses. It’s unlikely we’ll get a pandemic
          kindergarten, quite frankly. They go   So, what has changed? Well what   caused by bacteria because we have
          through colleges and universities, they   has changed is mass international air   broad-spectrum antibiotics. Basically,
          graduate and they learn nothing. They   travel, particularly from Asia. We now   anything that’s highly specific in terms
          emerge totally unscathed. Not at Janet   have a situation where you’ve got bats   of immunity for a virus will take about a
          Clarke Hall though, of course!   interacting with other species that are   year to get out, if you’re going to do all
                                           sold in live animal markets in China,   the proper trials.
          Is there a role for community input into  and we’ve also got live bird markets
          the research agenda for COVID-19?  which we know are a major source of   But what we could have done is focus on
                                           human influenza. Basically, this mass   drug development. For example, we have
          The community have to feel that they’re   international air-travel has ramped up   drugs for treating influenza. They work
          invested in things. It’s very important to   the level of threat enormously. We’re   across all of the influenza viruses. All
          have engagement. You can’t have the   going to have more events like this if we   of them. We have drugs to keep people
          community telling the researchers what   go back to that – and we will go back   alive with HIV. You need a cocktail of
          to do, because, in fact, very often even   to it because the commercial pressures   two or three so you don’t get multidrug
          we can’t determine what we do because   will be to do that. I think this virus is a   resistance. They’re wonderful drugs,
          we have to get it funded.        trial run.                        they’re designer drugs. Most of them
                                                                             have been made by knowing structure
          Research has to go through ethics   What do we do to protect the most   and devising a small molecule that works
          committees if it involves human   vulnerable members of our society   to block the virus from binding to the
          or animal experimentation, and   from a pandemic?                  human cell, or protease activity or some
          their community involvement is                                     other activity. And they work against all
          great. We have people from the   Well, for a start, we knew what would   of that class of viruses.
          broader community, we have animal   have protected our most vulnerable
          experimentation committees where   members. We knew that people in   What we should have been doing is
          we have people who are hostile to   aged care facilities were at massive risk.   making drugs against coronaviruses
          animal experimentation. That’s really   We knew that from what happened   that work against all coronaviruses.
          important because first they provide   in North America and in Europe,   We could test them easily, because
          the input to make sure that you don’t   particularly in Italy. And yet we did   you could test them against some of
          take it in a direction which would be   nothing. We continued to use casual   the common cold coronaviruses. So
          broadly unacceptable. Secondly, if you   workers who were working between   that’s where we fell down. When the
          are attacked over these issues, you can   different institutions and we continued   original SARS virus burnt out, the drug
          say ‘these are the people on our ethics   to underfund them. What we’ve had is   development was stopped. That’s what
          committees who looked at this.’ No   a totally obscene situation with people   should have continued. If we’d had
          other area of human existence works like  making vast amounts of money out of   a drug we knew worked against the
          this. An ethics committee that reviews   this industry and providing extremely   common cold virus, we could have
          a bank’s operations? Or a politician’s? If   bad care.             authorised it for immediate emergency
          only… Science, particularly biological                             use. And that would have made a
          science, is more closely scrutinised than   All the tendencies in society towards a   difference. We need drugs against the
          anything else.                   casualised workforce, to people working   coronaviruses, the paromyxoviruses like
                                           multiple jobs and all the rest of it, are   Hendra, the filoviruses like Ebola. These
          How likely is it that we’ll see another   dangerous. And it was the same with   are all carried in bats, and the bats are
          pandemic like this in our lifetime?  the security guards. I mean, appointing   sustaining these infections, and they’re
                                           a security company which had so little   big threats. So, we should be making
          Prior to 2002 there were two human   understanding of an infection that they   drugs against them. I think if we don’t do
          coronaviruses circulating among people.   were letting their people work between   that, we’re completely insane.
          These had probably come across from   quarantine hotels and aged care homes!
          bats too, and we’d known about them   What’s been revealed is massive   Do you have any final reflections on the
          since the 1960s. They cause common   institutional incompetence. I don’t know   year that you’d like to share?
          colds. Now, since 2002, five new   how we get around it because we work
          coronaviruses have crossed over from   by myth more than anything else. The   It’s been an odd sort of year. I think it’s
          human beings, all coming from bats,   myth in Australia that’s predominant is   taught us to value some things more than
          likely via an intermediate species. We   the one that’s been predominant in the   we might have done otherwise. I hope
          know that the original SARS one came   last thirty years: cut public spending,   people have got that message in general.
          via a civet cat. The Middle Eastern   privatise.

        6   LUCE  Number 19  2020
   1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   11