Page 39 - UTOPIA

of contradiction to others, or the pride of singularity, or to
make their court, would find out some pretence or other to
give the king a fair colour to carry the point. For if the judges
but differ in opinion, the clearest thing in the world is made
by that means disputable, and truth being once brought in
question, the king may then take advantage to expound the
law for his own profit; while the judges that stand out will
be brought over, either through fear or modesty; and they
being thus gained, all of them may be sent to the Bench to
give sentence boldly as the king would have it; for fair pre-
tences will never be wanting when sentence is to be given
in the prince’s favour. It will either be said that equity lies
of his side, or some words in the law will be found sound-
ing that way, or some forced sense will be put on them; and,
when all other things fail, the king’s undoubted preroga-
tive will be pretended, as that which is above all law, and to
which a religious judge ought to have a special regard. Thus
all consent to that maxim of Crassus, that a prince cannot
have treasure enough, since he must maintain his armies
out of it; that a king, even though he would, can do nothing
unjustly; that all property is in him, not excepting the very
persons of his subjects; and that no man has any other prop-
erty but that which the king, out of his goodness, thinks fit
to leave him. And they think it is the prince’s interest that
there be as little of this left as may be, as if it were his advan-
tage that his people should have neither riches nor liberty,
since these things make them less easy and willing to sub-
mit to a cruel and unjust government. Whereas necessity
and poverty blunts them, makes them patient, beats them

39