Page 5 - Newsletter#20finalcopy_Classical
P. 5

The Branch News rightly points out the political struggle   COVID VACCINATION – MUA LEADERSHIP GONE
    and failure of both major political parties to address this   MISSING
    attack agenda by employers. Such attacks are not new.
    Employer groups are taking advantage as expected to       Ever since that tawdry sight of “unrepresentative swill”
    increase  profits  by  reducing  wages  and  conditions,   (to borrow a phrase from Paul Keating), descending on
    classical capitalist methodology.                         the  CFMEU  Victorian  Branch  Office,  the  National

    While the reports indicate an intention to have a meeting   Leadership  of  the  MUA,  has  gone  into  hiding  on  the
    by legal advisors to discuss the mandatory vaccination    issue of COVID vaccination. Padraig has disappeared
    issue and your rights, there is still no official statement   into his bunker wherever that is these days and left it to
    from  the  Maritime  Division  on  what  you  do  if  an   individual branches to take the running on the issue.
    employer enforces upon you a “no jab, no work” policy.
                                                              As a result, the union’s efforts are confusing to say the
    Bland announcements and reminders of the upcoming         least. The normally astute WA Branch leadership has
    November AGM, in addition in appeals to ‘try and make     sought  Senior  Council’s  opinion  on  the  legality  of  a
    yourself available’ should include the correct advice, i.e.   Public Health Order. Their view is that while supporting
    the Business of the AGM  1. the financial reports of the   vaccination as a response to the global pandemic, they
    Union, 2. Any motions by members, and if necessary,       don’t  support  mandatory  vaccination  –  this  view
    advice of a ‘Special Meeting’ to deal with possible rule   apparently  extends  to  a  Public  Health  Order  recently
    changes and other business.                               issued by the State Government in respect of exposed

    The  list  of  rushed  inclusions  did  not  inform  members   port workers.
    about the following.  While national and state tributes
    recognised the passing of John Coombs, nothing was        On  the  other  hand,  The  Acting  Queensland  Branch
    said  at  the  September  BMM  by  officials,  but  for  Jeff   Secretary has indicated the branch has “followed and
    Langdon’s raising it at the meeting. No mention in the    supported the health advice and public health orders”,
    Branch news.                                              nevertheless  parroting  the  line  that  they  support
                                                              vaccination as a response to the global pandemic but do
    No  reference  to  the  Qld  Governments  $22  million  for   not support mandatory vaccination – it’s not immediately
    shipping and training in the sector. Or any update on     clear  whether  Qld  branch  opposition  (to  mandatory
    progress.    No  indication  of  what  numbers  of  new   vaccination) extends to Public Health Orders.
    members obtained in Nth Qld specifically ships crews,
    among the other achievements with Seaswift.  No report    Padraig has gone into a funk since the sight of those
    or condemnation of the Aukis treaty and the dangers of    Melbourne  gatherings  fearing  this  represents  a  split
    nuclear-powered vessels in Australian waters.             between the rank and file and their union officials thus

    It  was  good  to  see  reports  from  the  ITF  (a  first)  and   leaving the union (and himself), vulnerable. Being very
    despite the outline of work done by Brian Gallagher, it   much  risk  averse,  he’s  just  disappeared.  Frankly,  his
    could be interpreted as a possible ‘resume’ for a hopeful   attitude has just fuelled the fear by branch officials of a
    ongoing  position.    The  Women’s  Committee  reports    rank-and-file uprising against the union. As usual, he’s
    from  various  participants  were  prominently  self-     got it all wrong.
    congratulatory on receiving personal awards. It’s a pity
    that there wasn’t a focused industrial report on how and   The  VAST  majority  of  people  whether  they  be  old,
    if,  effectively  Companies  are  abiding  by  Sexual  and   young, male, female, working or not working, blue collar
    Harassment policies, they and the union ascribe to.       or white collar, native born, immigrant or visa holder are
    Nothing  too  about  the  CFMMEU  office  attack  or  the   taking the jab, already up to 80% in some states. There
    rallies  in  Victoria  described  by  the  press  as  unionist   is  absolutely  no  evidence  to  suggest  building
    angry with the CFMMEU but exposed also the hijacking      construction and maritime workers in Victoria or in any
    of concerns by the fascist and right-wing elements.  We
    would have expected that aspect alone surely warranted    other state don’t hold similar views.
    some political or industrial commentary.?
                                                              So, the vast majority of people including those engaged
    We note with satisfaction the reports from the ILA/IDC    in the maritime or building sectors are not going to be
    and its stand on refusal to “not work a container ship    too fussed about workplace related public health orders
    without  a  crew  aboard”  What  a  courageous  and       issued by Government.
    principled  stance.  And  our  own  organisation  appears
    unable to do that or even emulate the  Canadian SUI.      They’re more likely to be quite supportive because of the
    and make a stand, for inclusion in Australia’s’ expanding   added  protection  to  themselves  as  a  result.  The  real
    and  demanding  export  sectors.!  Asleep  at  the  Helm   issue  for  union  concern  is  where  an  employer  in  the
    comes to mind.                                            absence of a Public Health Order, seeks to introduce a
                                                              no  jab,  no  job  policy  by  unilateral  decision  without
    **************************************************************
                                                              appropriate consultation and the support of a significant
                                                  Page.2      majority of its entire workforce.
   1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10