Page 93 - BFSI CHRONICLE 10 th Issue (2nd Annual Issue ) .indd
P. 93

BFSI Chronicle, 2 Annual Issue, 10  Edition July 2022
                       nd
                                       th
             nomination shall stand automatically  “that a mere nomination made under section 39
             revived when the policy is reassigned  of the Act does not have the effect of conferring
             by the assignee or retransferred by the  on the nominee any benefi cial interest in the
             transferee in favour of the policyholder  amount payable under the life insurance policy
             on repayment of loan other than on a  on the death of the assured. The nomination
             security of policy to the insurer.      only indicates the hand which is authorised to
        Prior to the Amendment, if the Policyholder dies   receive the amount, on the payment of which
        after the date of maturity but prior to the date   the insurer gets a valid discharge of its liability
        of payment of maturity value, the nomination   under the policy. The amount, however, can be
        used to be invalid and the title under the policy   claimed by the heirs of the assured in accordance
        in such a case was considered to be an open title   with the law of succession governing them.”
        and this used to cause difficulties in proving   D.  Insurance is a contract of utmost Good
        the title under the policy for payment of policy   Faith and the insured is expected to
        value. Section 38 [11] removed this difficulty.    not to suppress any material facts in
        Section 38 [11] reads: “Where a policyholder       the proposal form while proposing
        dies after the maturity of the policy but the      for insurance. If the Insured does not
        proceeds and benefit of his policy has not been     disclose complete facts in the proposal,

        made to him because of his death, in such a        the Insurance Company is well within
        case, his nominee shall be entitled to the
                                                           its rights to rescind the contract and not
        proceeds and benefi t of his policy.” Thus, the     to honour any claim under such policy
        Nominee is entitled to maturity proceeds under
                                                           if the Insurance Company comes to
        a policy if the policyholder dies after the date   know about non-disclosure of material
        of maturity but before the payment of maturity     facts at a later stage. A material fact is
        value.
                                                           any information that may influence
        There is a reference to the Beneficial Nominees    the judgement of a prudent insurance
        who are classified as parents, or spouse, or       underwriter in deciding whether to
        children, or spouse and children, or any of        accept a risk or not and if to accept the
        them.                                              risk, at what premium and terms and
                                                           conditions. The insurer may call the
        Section 39 contains 11 sub-sections and it is      policy in question at any time within 3
        recommended that the Act may be referred           years from the date of the policy, if there
        to for understanding the provisions of             is evidence to prove that the life insured
        Nomination completely.                             has suppressed material facts.

        Though a holder of a life insurance policy on his   Section 45 of the Insurance Act states that
        own life may name any person as the nominee   no policy shall be called in question on the
        under the policy, it may be understood that the   grounds of misstatement after 3 years. The
        rights of a nominee are not absolute and it is   Section 45 [1] reads:
        necessary to refer to the judgment of the Apex
        Court in Civil Appeal No. 96 of 1972 in a case   “45. (1) No policy of life insurance shall be
        titled as Sarabati Devi vs Usha Devi in their   called in question on any ground whatsoever
        order dated 06.12.1983, the Apex Court held:  after the expiry of three years from the date of



        The Institute Of Cost Accountants Of India

                                                                                             93
   88   89   90   91   92   93   94   95   96   97   98