Page 94 - BFSI CHRONICLE 10 th Issue (2nd Annual Issue ) .indd
P. 94

BFSI Chronicle, 2 Annual Issue, 10  Edition July 2022
                                                                                th
                                                                nd
        the policy, i.e., from the date of issuance of the   and communicate his acceptance to the
        policy or the date of commencement of risk or      person making offer. Similarly, the mere
        the date of revival of the policy or the date of   receipt and retention of premium until
        the rider to the policy, whichever is later.”      after the death of the applicant or mere
                                                           preparation of the policy document is
           Hon’ble Supreme Court in their judgment       not acceptance and doesn’t give rise to
             dated 10/07/2009 in the case of Satwant       contract-acceptance must be signified
             Kaur Sandhu Vs. New India Assurance           by some act or acts agreed on by the
             Co. Ltd. (civil appeal no. 2776 of 2002)      parties or from which the law rises a
             observed: ”Nonetheless, it is a contract of   presumption of acceptance”
             insurance falling in the category of contract

             uberrimae fidei, meaning a contract of utmost  From the above, it is evident that the person
             good faith on the part of the assured. Thus,  seeking insurance cover should give true and
             it needs little emphasis that when an  accurate answers to the questions in a proposal

             information on a specific aspect is asked  for insurance. It will be in the interest of the
             for in the proposal form, an assured is  person seeking insurance to not to suppress
             under a solemn obligation to make a true  any material information in the proposal form
             and full disclosure of the information  which may entitle an insurance company to
             on the subject which is within his  rescind the contract at a later date when the
             knowledge. It is not for the proposer  insurance company can establish suppression
             to determine whether the information  of material facts by the proposer for insurance.
             sought for is material for the purpose of
             the policy or not.”
                                                     Note: Any views or opinions represented in this
           Hon’ble Supreme Court in appeal no.2197
             of 1970 – LIC of India vs. Rajavasi Reddy,   article are in the author’s personal capacity and
             has observed “A contract concludes only   do not represent those of people, institutions or
             when the party to whom an offer has     organisations that the author is associated with.
             been made accepts it unconditionally

























                                                                The Institute Of Cost Accountants Of India

         94
   89   90   91   92   93   94   95   96   97   98   99