Page 811 - Atlas of Creation Volume 4

Harun Yahya

be answered by “the origin of life” (in other words, Almighty Allah) which has brought Darwinism to
its end. Darwinists can only tell fairy tales about how various species originated, and how the imaginary
anthropoid creatures they conjure up were somehow the distant ancestors of all mankind.
There are many people in the world who simply accept what they hear, read, or see without critical

evaluation of the facts. Darwinists use this weak point, and fully exploit this tendency. Most people who
fall into the Darwinist trap have these tendencies, and thus accept Darwinism, even if they don't see any
scientific proof or reasonableness in the theory. For this reason, simple though illogical explanations on
the part of the Darwinists over the last 150 years have deceived innumerable people, and brought a good

part of the world under the sway of the system of the antichrist.
A good example on this subject is a book for children entitled, The Wonderful Egg. A story with a
highly illogical outcome is told in this book. A mother dinosaur leaves her nest of eggs unattended for
a brief while, and interestingly, the “first bird” hatches out of one the eggs. The “bird” born from a

mother dinosaur grows up over the course of the story, and miraculously has wings and feathers; in
time, it starts to fly to the branches of a tree. However, the most interesting (and perhaps tragic) part of
this book is not in the story itself. Rather, it is that this book, which proposes a stunning absurdity, was
supported and recommended by the American Association for the Advancement of Science, the

American Council on Education, and the Association for Childhood Education International. 95
That any scientist could come up with such an outlandish idea boggles the imagination. Every
schoolchild knows that birds have an anatomical structure which supports flight, with appropriate or-
gans, feathers, wings, a specialized respiratory system, and that birds absolutely did not come out of

reptile eggs. Yet the adherents of the Darwinist ideology will put forward even the most laughable the-
ories, and they know that when these theories are disproven, they will have to debase themselves.
Nonetheless, for the Darwinists, all that matters is the unconditional defense of Darwinism.
Scientific editor Gordon Rattray Taylor's confession regarding this topic truly explains the error sim-

ple logic to which Darwinism submits:
Evolutionary history is a mass of such modifications; one could almost say it consists of them. Scales
become feathers. Legs become wings. Stomachs become swim bladders. Even at the level of biochemi-
cal processes, substitutions and elaborations occur. All Darwinism has to say about such miracles is that

they are due to chance. 96
The following is from a newspaper article which doctor Nicholas Comninellis from Missouri
University gave a place to in his book;
Evolution is a fairy tale for grown-ups. This theory has helped nothing in the progress of science. It

is useless. 97

Darwinist scientists who stay silent about fraud

A secret agreement between Darwinist scientists has been developed in order to enhance the en-
chantment of Darwinism and to maximize its efficiency as a propaganda tool. With a handful of excep-
tions, almost everyone stays silent in regard to the illogical, inconsistent, and childish so-called expla-
nations which have been developed in order to defend the Darwinian theory.

Occasionally these explanations become a source of considerable embarrassment to the Darwinists,
who might be expected to object to these outlandish claims, but typically abstain from comment out of
fear of negative reaction from the rest of their peers. For example, though Charles Darwin claimed that

the North American black bear turned into a whale as the result of opening its mouth wide in order to
catch insects in the river, or that fish who rose up and turned with the help of their fins became perfectly
formed creatures with wings that flew through the air, these bizarre speculations are nowadays dis-
avowed by the vast majority of Darwinists, though a handful of the more traditional Darwinists occa-
98
sionally espouse them from time to time. Finally, in 2009, the fossil known as “Ida” was correctly iden-
tified as belonging not to some imaginary human ancestor, but to a lemur. This farce was in the head-

Adnan Oktar 809