Page 815 - Atlas of Creation Volume 4

Harun Yahya

tion, that is made incomprehensible by the use of scientific terminology, is carefully and con-
stantly employed just like a magic spell, and most people fail even to notice.
The theologian R. C. Sproul says this on the subject:

When scientists attribute instrumental power to chance, they have left the domain of physics and resorted

to magic. Chance is their magic wand to make not only rabbits but entire universes appear out of nothing. 104

No matter how much Darwinists try to maintain this indoctrination, the mira-
cle they in fact refer to is blind, mindless and unconscious chance. Coincidences
are events that take place at random, with no conscious agent behind them, and with
no intelligent power to shape or design anything. It is of course impossible for an event
that takes place at random to find the correct method by trial and error, to predict future

events and take the requisite precautions, to design beforehand what an organ will re-
semble, to be altruistic or to display love and loyalty. It flies in the face of reason, logic,
science and common sense to maintain that a fictitious power unable to produce even a

pin could give rise to all the glorious variety of life on Earth.
The expression “unable to produce even a pin” is used here as a response to Darwinist claims,
and to emphasize their impossibility. In reality, of course, it is an error of logic and lack of sound
reasoning to suggest that chance can “produce” anything at all. But Darwinists have been able to
use that flawed logic to deceive the entire world. According to this peculiar Darwinist logic, there is

nothing that chance cannot do, given sufficient time.
The following passage from the Nobel prize-winning evolutionist and biologist George
Wald is an explicit expression of the formula chance + time in which Darwinists be-

lieve as if it were a magic spell:

One has only to wait: time itself performs the miracles. Given so much time, the ‘im-
possible’ becomes possible, the possible probable, and the probable virtually. 105

The aim behind all these illogical ideas, of course, is for Darwinists to be able to bring
some other explanation than creation to bear, at least in their own eyes. Darwinists are cer-
tainly very well aware that it is inconceivable for chance and time to combine together to
produce flowers, cats, fish, birds, reptiles and human beings from a collection of mud. But

instead of signing up to the truth, they are still trying to depict the illogical as logical.
As we have seen, all Darwinist accounts are based on deception. Take away
all the Darwinists flowery language, Latin terminology and incomprehensible

scientific words and all that remains is the deception of “all life came into be-
ing as the result of random events, through a combination of blind coinci-
dences, and with no control process, precautionary measures or intelligent
intervention.” And this is the deception that Darwinists are really trying to
get people to believe.

This extract from the atheist and evolutionary biologist Richard
Dawkins, one of the most passionate contemporary Darwinists, is enough to
see the dead-end facing Darwinist logic:

Chance can never give rise to life, no matter
what Darwinists claim. It is entirely the
artistry of Allah.

Adnan Oktar 813