Page 816 - Atlas of Creation Volume 4

... The jet engine analogy suggested that animals ought to be risible monstrosities of lashed-up improvisa-

tion, top-heavy with grotesque relics of patched-over antiquity. How can we reconcile this reasonable ex-
pectation with the formidable grace of the hunting cheetah, the aerodynamic beauty of the swift, the scrupu-
lous attention to deceptive detail of the leaf insect? 106

Allah has so ensnared the antichrist that the supporters of the antichrist have had to resort to the myth
of “chance,” in order to oppose Allah, in their own foolish eyes, an idea which is so illogical and irrational

that even primary school children would find it ludicrous. Chance is such a perverse and mindless idea
that it would be more logical to suggest that insects used their lofty intellectual abilities to produce high-
ly sophisticated technological equipment. But the spell of the antichrist has convinced some people of this
nonsense and made it something that is even taught in schools. But as people have seen how chance has

been supposedly deified and endowed with a supposed creative power (surely Allah is beyond that),
Darwinism, the worst trickery of the antichrist in the End Times, has become truly pitiable.
Allah reveals in verses:

Ask them for a ruling: is it they who are stronger in structure or other things We have created? We created
them from sticky clay. No wonder you are surprised as they laugh with scorn! When they are reminded they
do not pay heed. When they see a Sign they only laugh with scorn. They say, ‘This is just downright magic.

When we are dead and turned to dust and bones will we then be raised up again alive? And our earlier an-
cestors as well?’ Say: ‘Yes, and you will be in a despicable state.’ (Qur’an, 37:11-18)

3. Darwinists ignore the fundamental quandaries of the

theory of evolution

There is one very important fact that needs to be known about the lie that is Darwinism: Darwinism
has to date offered no rational scientific answer to the question of how the first living thing appeared. It

is unclear how that fictitious “first cell,” which Darwinists regard as the origin of all, or even the first
protein inside it could have emerged. The theory of evolution has totally collapsed in the face of a sin-
gle protein whose origin it is unable to account for.

This fact is well known to all Darwinists. That is why they try to gloss it over or make you forget
about it in every Darwinist report or program you read or watch. It is impossible to learn from anywhere
that engages in Darwinist propaganda that there is zero possibility of a protein forming by chance, that
the countless experiments performed over the history of science show that have been unable to produce
a single cell protein or a single organelle, and that the structure of the cell is too flawless and irreducibly

complex to be able to come into being by chance because these facts demolish the simplistic
and unscientific Darwinist account of the origin of life. Bearing in mind that chance can-
not even account for the amino acids inside a protein, the theory of evolution’s ficti-

tious formula "time + chance + muddy water" is reminiscent of the titles of books
of fairy tales written for primary schools.
Scientific writer Hank Hanegraaff summarizes the probability calcu-
lations regarding a single protein molecule as follows:

814 Atlas of Creation Vol. 4