Page 825 - Atlas of Creation Volume 4

Harun Yahya

A lot of people on a lot of blogs called me unprintable names and a lot of very nasty comments. All the peo-
ple suggested the people called the university I work at and suggested me to retire. I realized when I kind
of what public with my doubts about the ... theory... criticism what has amazed me was the viciousness and

sort of baseness. 124
In the same way, Professor Robert Marks’ research site at Baylor University was closed because he

questioned Darwinism and the funding given to him for his research demanded back.
The documentary concerned considers the experiences of a great many anti-Darwinist scientists,
whether they were willing to divulge their names or not, and these people described in their own words

how their academic careers were totally ended because of their rejection of Darwinism.
The journalist Larry Witham summarizes the essence of Darwinism and the methods employed by
the Darwinist dictatorship:

Once you're thick in Science, you can question the paradigm. But if you want to get grants, if you want to be

elected to high positions, if you want to get awards as a promoter of public education of Science, you can't
question the paradigm.

I interviewed dozens and dozens of scientists and, when they're amongst each other or talking to a journal-
ist who they trust, they'll speak about 'It's incredibly complex' or 'Molecular Biology is in a crisis', but, pub-
licly, they can't say that. 125

Pamela Winnick, another journalist, describes how her career was put to an end after writing a piece

on the subject of Creation and says:

If you give any credence to it [Creationism] -- whatsoever -- which means 'just writing about it', you are just
finished as a journalist. 126

When the philosopher Stephen Meyer published his opinion that the information in DNA cannot be
explained in terms of chance and that it is rather the work of a superior intelligence, Darwinists at-
tempted to wreck the career of the journal’s editor. 127 The American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU)

brought legal charges because of stickers carrying warnings about evaluating evolution “with an open
mind in a careful and critical manner” placed on text books in the town of Cobb in the U.S. state of
Georgia. Families representing the organization brought charges against schools simply for suggesting

teaching on the subject of evolution and Creation. A small group in Dover, Pennsylvania, supported by
the ACLU and Americans United for Separation of Church and State, filed a legal suit in order to pre-
vent the discussion of Creation in ninth year biology classes. The judge ruled in their favor, and the

school has been told to pay compensation to the plaintiff. That sum is likely to EXCEED ONE MILLION
DOLLARS. 128
The writer Ann Coulter offers this analysis;

After Dover, no school district will dare breathe a word about “creationism”, unless they want to risk being

bankrupted by ACLU lawsuits. The Darwinists have saved the secular sanctity of their temples: the public
schools. They didn’t win on science, persuasion, or the evidence. They won the way liberals always win: by
finding a court to hand them everything they want on a silver platter.

This isn’t science... 129

These repressive methods employed by Darwinist have a high deterrent effect on some people.
Faced with a $1 million fine, a school will be hugely intimidated. A teacher who refuses to back down

risks losing his or her job. As William A. Dembski says, this system resembles a dictatorial regime.
Nobody can even open his mouth to breathe a word against it.
As a scientist, the evolutionist and professor of physics H. S. Lipson says that science points to

Creation, and describes how hard it is to sign up to that fact because of the pressure from the Darwinist
dictatorship:

Adnan Oktar 823