Page 829 - Atlas of Creation Volume 4

Harun Yahya

who are disenchanted with the Darwinists’ censorship of opposing viewpoints. When isolated dissi-
dents begin to realize how many of their colleagues feel the same way, more and more of them will
begin to speak out. 136

7. Darwinists use science and put on a scientific show

Science is Darwinists’ most important disguise. Darwinism first emerged under the guise of
“science.” Darwinists also appeared saying, “We are scientists.” Every reaction against Darwinism
has been misrepresented as “an attack on science.” All forms of doubt regarding the theory of evo-

lution are depicted as a kind of “backwardness or assault on science.” Darwinists have misrepre-
sented all kinds of false evidence as if it were a scientific finding. To put it another way,
Darwinism has misused science for the last 150 years.
So is Darwinism really science?

Darwinism is a deception. There is nothing scientific about it. Darwinism is simply as false en-
deavor aimed at getting people to believe a lie. Science is Darwinism’s last refuge. Darwinism
makes itself immune by the use of science. It defends frauds that it calls science. It describes
Darwinists, who produce false evidence and tell fairy tales, as scientists. But it accuses the people

who realize that Darwinism is a deception, and strive against it, of a betrayal of science. Science is
Darwinism’s greatest weapon. It has deceived countless people to date by wearing a scientific
mask. And it is still using science to perpetuate that deception. That is why Darwinist scientific
journals, Darwinist documentary channels and Darwinist scientists use it.

The British paleontologist and evolutionist Derek V. Ager says this on the subject:

We all know that many apparent evolutionary bursts are nothing more than brainstorms on the part
of particular paleontologists. One splitter in a library can do far more than millions of years of genet-
ic mutation... 137

This is so very true. Evolutionist myths such as the supposed primordial Earth, the liv-
ing species that emerged through mutations and natural selection, the mythical common

ancestors and the strange-looking creatures that had not yet completed their develop-
ment that appear in school text books and in newspapers, journals and on television
are all the product of Darwinist scientists’ own imaginations. They have never arrived
at any assumed end over the years by way of natural selection. As Derek Ager says, ge-
netic mutations also failed to produce that result. But they still imagine that to deny these sci-

entific facts and continue to propagate the same false claims will increase the likelihood of the de-
ception that is Darwinism spreading across the world. That is why Darwinists use scientific
words, in order to make the Darwinist deception look more scientific. There are no scientific ex-

periments or evidence that have been proven and corroborate evolution. All we have are fre-
quently used scientific terms and formulae. One can often encounter such interesting terminology
or chemical formulae in books by any Darwinist author. When someone ignorant of the subject
looks at such books, he may really imagine that it contains a scientist’s scientific knowledge. But
appearances are deceptive. The only thing described in such a book is the myth that living things

emerged and assumed their present forms as the result of blind chance. No Darwinist author has
anything new to say, nor any scientific evidence to present. The chemical terminology and for-
mulae are merely in order to complete the Darwinist deception and, in their eyes, give it a realis-

tic air.
The evolutionary paleontologist S. M. Stanley provides an example of Darwinist methods of
misusing science:

Evolution happens rapidly in small, localized populations, so we’re not likely to see it in the fossil
record. 138

Adnan Oktar 827