Page 831 - Atlas of Creation Volume 4

Harun Yahya

These words are misleading. The extract refers to evolution taking place in local populations, but
there is no evidence. It is even admitted that no evidence will be found, but even this is given a scien-
tific gloss. The fact of the matter is this; no evolution can be seen in the fossil record, because no evolu-
tion ever happened.

National Center of Science Education (NCSE) director Eugene C. Scott made the following statement
on the subject:

Many high school (and even, unfortunately, some college) textbooks describe theories as tested hypotheses,
as if a hypothesis that is confirmed is somehow promoted to a theory, and a really, really good theory gets
crowned as law. Unfortunately, this is not how scientists use these terms, but most people are not scientists

and scientists have not done a very good job of communicating the meanings of these terms to students and
the general public. 139

Under these conditions, someone whose experience is limited to what is shown and told to him may
well form the impression that Darwinism is valid, if he has no power to think and reflect in an unprej-
udiced manner because with its conditioning technique, Darwinism somehow responds to the reader’s

expectations. It offers a simplistic account of life, in its own foolish eyes, and says this is “scientific.” It
says, “There is no need to question it, as it is true and proven.” “Scientists confirm it,” it says. “This is
the only scientific explanation for life, and no other accounts are scientific,” it says. "The whole world
agrees,” it says. And through these lies, one of the worst deceptions in history has been built up. And
that is all it takes to convince someone who knows nothing about Darwinism, or what a gross deception

it is, and whose entire experience is limited to these accounts.
The fact is however, that such people are misled at every stage of this conditioning. Darwinists kept
the more than 350 million fossils that definitely refute Darwinism and prove the fact of Creation care-

fully hidden away; the fact that it is mathematically impossible for a single protein, the building blocks
of life, to form by chance was carefully kept hidden away. So it has also been impossible to make out the
scale of the deception. What people who have been deceived in this way do not know is this: Darwinism
is neither science, nor scientific. Darwinism has been questioned, and it has been proved that it is un-
true and unsupported by any scientific evidence. The scientists who espouse Darwinism are people who

are dogmatically and fanatically devoted to this superstitious faith. The only explanation that science
provides for life is Creation. All scientific findings show that living things were created in a single mo-
ment in all their perfect states. It is again this false conditioning and indoctrination that lies behind the

manner in which Darwinism enjoys acceptance across the world. Therefore, the subjects that convince
such people are no more than sleight of hand. Even scientists may sometimes be taken in by this decep-
tion. The British paleontologist and evolutionist Colin Patterson makes an interesting confession on this
subject:

Then I woke up and realized that all my life I had been duped into taking evolution as revealed truth in some

way. I feel that the effects of hypotheses of common ancestry in systematics has not been merely boring, not
just a lack of knowledge, I think it has been positively anti-knowledge” 140

Brian Leith, a documentary film producer, gives another example of gradual awareness of the subject:

In the past ten years there has emerged a new breed of biologists who are considered scientifically re-
spectable, but who have their doubts about Darwinism. 141

Another important piece of evidence confirming the accuracy of the American economist Jeremy
Rifkin's words that "Evolutionary theory has been enshrined as the center-piece of our educational sys-
tem, and elaborate walls have been erected around it to protect it from unnecessary abuse." 142 is the

way that they turn a blind eye to these frauds by Darwinist scientists and are not even em-
barrassed or offended when the true facts emerge. The best-known scientists in the
world deliberately maintain this deception in order to be able to mislead people.
Jonathan Wells cites an example:

Adnan Oktar 829