Page 835 - Atlas of Creation Volume 4

Harun Yahya

ic. Darwinism is still defended despite having been scientifically discredited. Meanwhile, these people
ignorantly deny Creation, even though it is corroborated by countless pieces of scientific evidence.
Because according to materialism, no account outside matter is acceptable. That is why these journals
that appear to be scientific so insistently defend an idea such as evolution that is of no scientific worth

whatsoever. For these publications, evidence showing the fact that living things were created is unac-
ceptable at any price. That is why Darwinists have no compunctions about depicting a deception they
have imposed on the whole world through false methods as true and valid instead.
Indeed, when one looks at the attitude toward Allah of the various scientific centers that support

these publications, the position becomes perfectly clear. The result of a recent investigation in Nature
magazine concerning the views about religion of members of the U.S. National Academy of Science
(NAS) was this: according to responses from 517 NAS members from departments of biology and
physics, 72.2% are atheists, 20.8% are agnostics, while only 7.0% believe in Allah. 145 The following ad-

mission by the neurobiologist and evolutionist Robert Provine makes this perfectly clear: "Very few tru-
ly religious biologists remain. Most are atheists and many have been driven there by their understand-
ing of the evolutionary process and other sciences. 146 In the light of these facts, it is not hard to see why
any attempt to show the truth of the fact of Creation is met with intense rage by atheist scientists. And

that is the reason why Darwinists make such use of the written and visual media.
Henry M. Morris gives the following account of the false conditioning carried out under Darwinism:

The common belief today is that Charles Darwin discovered the law of evolution; as a result he is widely ac-
claimed as one of the greatest scientists of all time. The fact is...that [Darwin] really only served as the cata-
lyst for a revival of ancient paganism, coming at just the right time in history to bring to fruition a revolt

against God [Surely God is beyond that] for which many in Western Europe had been preparing for over a
century". 147

The misconceptions that “scientists don’t lie” and “scientific journals will never lie” have deceived
people for years. The distorted system of faith that such people have constructed among themselves has
led Darwinists to take advantage of, and misuse, science. But this is an absolute certainty: A materialist
scientist will happily deceive people if the facts do not serve his own interests and do not corroborate

materialism. The great majority of scientists in the world today are blatantly misleading people by es-
pousing Darwinism. They tell tall tales that even children would never believe, even though people
know they are scientifically impossible. This state of affairs is a system currently in operation and ap-

plied by all the world’s Darwinist scientists. To put it another way, even though a Darwinist scientist
spends his whole life in close contact with science, he can still comfortably deceive people in the name
of science and devote his whole life to a lie.
Francis Crick, the professor of physics and biology who won the Nobel prize for his discovery of
DNA, who spent his whole life espousing evolution and who attracted strong criticism for saying that

“human beings are collections of neurons” in 2004, and who died denying the existence of the soul, is
the best example of this. Despite, as an atheist physicist, molecular biologist and neurobiologist, seeing
countless proofs of Allah’s sublime creative artistry and even discovering these in per-

son, he still strove throughout the course of his life to hide the fact that these proofs
are all miraculous in nature and indicate a very special creation. For the sake of
denying the existence of Allah (surely Allah is beyond that) he went so far as to
claim that life had been brought to Earth by space creatures. 148 The conclusion to
which a naturalist, Darwinist perspective leads a man of science is a humiliating

illogicality.
Another example of this is the Darwinist and Harvard University paleontol-
ogist Stephen Jay Gould, who spent his whole life as an atheist and naturalist,

despite personally witnessing and examining all the proofs of creation dis-
played by paleontology. Just like Crick, Gould worked in science his entire

Adnan Oktar 833