Page 839 - Atlas of Creation Volume 4
P. 839

Harun Yahya






             hand, there exists not one piece of evidence to support Darwinism. That is why people who espouse this
             terrible deception foolishly criticize belief in creation. The University of New York professor of chem-
             istry and evolutionist Robert Shapiro makes the irrational statement that he will support Darwinism to
             the bitter end, even if the results do not corroborate the theory of evolution:

                 Some future day may yet arrive when all reasonable chemical experiments run to discover a probable origin

                 for life have failed unequivocally. Further, new geological evidence may indicate a sudden appearance of life
                 on the earth. Finally, we may have explored the universe and found no trace of life, or process leading to life,
                 elsewhere. In such case, some scientists might choose to turn to religion for an answer. Others, however, my-
                 self included, would attempt to sort out the surviving less probable scientific explanations in hope of select-

                 ing one that is still more likely than the remainder.   151
                 These words are more than adequate to see the sinister system of the antichrist.




                               10. Darwinists try to use the similarities between

                                                           monkeys and humans

                 We have already mentioned that Darwinism is based on a most simplistic logic and tends to account

             for life in a most superficial and facile way. As a result, one of Darwinists’ most important propaganda
             tools are monkeys. Due to various aspects of their anatomical characteristics, monkeys really are creat-
             ed to be similar to be humans. These similarities are something that deceive most Darwinists,

             and thus lead them to mislead others.
                 In order to be able to make use of the similarity between humans and monkeys,
             Darwinists look at a monkey and emphasize various aspects of its behavior, such as
             use of tools or ability to learn. The aim is to supposedly legitimize the famous
             Darwinist deception that humans are descended from apes and cause people to form

             that impression. Once some people have been exposed to such conditioning, and go
             to the zoo or watch a documentary about monkeys, they develop a specific opinion
             along those lines. So influenced do they become by this Darwinist deception that they

             are easily able to believe that a living thing they see could easily turn into human being
             “if it grew a bit, shaved off its fur and ate better food.” A few technical similarities laid
             the foundation for successful Darwinist conditioning. Programs about monkeys that have
             learned various primitive forms of behavior similar to those in human beings appear
             again and again on Darwinist TV stations and internet sites. Some viewers who see what

             a monkey can do when trained, and who have little knowledge of Darwinism, come to
             possess a completely erroneous perspective because of the Darwinist conditioning they
             are subjected to. Intelligent behavior exhibited by monkeys is shown over and over again




















        Darwinists try to mislead people by using the simila-
        rities between human beings and apes. But what ma-
        kes human beings human is that they have a soul.









                                                                                                                                         837
   834   835   836   837   838   839   840   841   842   843   844