Page 843 - Atlas of Creation Volume 4

Harun Yahya

This method of conditioning is still going on. Pictures of fish starting to move from the sea onto dry
land and whose fins are gradually turning into legs are total figments of the imagination. Darwinists use
the same methods in order to make people believe in such a passage, which is devoid of any evidence.
Placing a series of monkeys gradually becoming more and more erect and turning into humans along-

side such reports in scientific journals or web sites carrying this deception makes it possible for the is-
sue to be equated with evolution. Shown this report and accompanying visual indoctrination, any read-
er may perceive this as part of, or even evidence for evolution. Most of the time they do not even read
the words in the reports, but these pictures reminiscent of evolution remain in their memories. The same

people are subjected to the same conditioning from pictures of evolution placed alongside reports about
cloning or the Human Genome Project, but which actually have nothing to do with it. The impression is
given that any scientific progress in the Human Genome Project is actually scientific proof of evolution.
This fraudulent visual conditioning is a typical element of Darwinist propaganda. It is one of the

most frequently employed psychological conditioning techniques. The fact remains, however, that elab-
orate reconstructions based on a fossil skull are just works of art that if nothing else, certainly reflect the
imaginative powers of different artists. Just as in the example of Nebraska Man.
This had absolutely nothing to do with science. Not anything to do with evolution. All that is hap-

pening is fraudulent indoctrination rather than the production of any scientific evidence.
Jonathan Wells summarized this Darwinist fraud:

Roger Lewin recounts an occasion when paleoanthropologists Alan Walker, Michael Day, and Richard
Leakey were studying the two sections of “skull 1470.” According to Lewin, Walder said: “You could hold
the [upper jaw] forward, and give it a long face, or you could tuck it in, making the face short” How you held

it really depended on your preconceptions. It was very interesting watching what people did with it.” Lewin
reports that Leakey recalled the incident too: “Yes. If you held it one way, it looked like one thing; if you held
it another, it looked like something else

Just recently, National Geographic magazine commissioned four artists to reconstruct a female figure from
casts of seven fossil bones thought to be from the 1470 skull. One artist drew a creature whose forehead is
missing and whose jaws look vaguely like those of a beaked dinosaur. The other artist drew a rather good-

looking modern African-American woman with unusually long arms. A third drew a somewhat scrawny fe-
male with arms like a gorilla and a face like a Hollywood werewolf. And a fourth drew a figure covered with
body hair and climbing a tree, with beady eyes that glare out
from under a heavy gorilla-like brow. 152

This remarkable set of drawings shows clearly how a
single set of fossil bones can be reconstructed in a variety of

ways. Someone looking for an intermediate form to plug in-
to ape-to-human sequence could pick whichever drawing
seems to fit best.
The reason why Darwinists can perpetrate such fraud

so easily is that they can take fossils of extinct life forms,
shape them as they wish, and give them whatever appear-

Cloning has nothing to do with evolution at all. In
cloning, DNA taken from one living thing created by
Allah is transferred into another gene. In addition, this
process is carried out in highly specialized laborato-
ries equipped with the most advanced technology, in
controlled conditions and under rigid observation.

Adnan Oktar 841