Page 32 - The Collapse of the Theory of Evolution in 20 Questions

THE COLLAPSE OF THE THEORY OF EVOLUTION IN 20 QUESTIONS

Impartial examinations of the footprints revealed their
real owners. In reality, these footprints consisted of 20 fos-
silized footprints of a 10-year-old modern human and 27
footprints of an even younger one. Such famous paleoan-

thropologists as Don Johnson and Tim White, who exam-
ined the prints found by Mary Leakey, corroborated that
conclusion. White revealed his thoughts by saying:
Make no mistake about it,... They are like modern human foot-
prints. If one were left in the sand of a California beach today,
and a four-year old were asked what it was, he would instantly
say that somebody had walked there. He wouldn't be able to
tell it from a hundred other prints on the beach, nor would
you. 10

These footprints sparked an important debate among
evolutionists. That was because for them to accept that these
were human footprints would mean that the imaginary pro-
gression they had drawn up from ape to man could no
longer be maintained. However, at this point dogmatic evo-
lutionist logic once again showed its face. Most evolutionist

scientists once more abandoned science for the sake of their
prejudices. They claimed that the footprints found at Laetoli
were those of an ape-like creature. Russell Tuttle, who was
one of the evolutionists defending this claim, wrote:
In sum, the 3.5 million-year-old footprint traits at Laetoli site G
resemble those of habitually unshod modern humans. None of
their features suggest that the Laetoli hominids were less capa-
ble bipeds than we are. If the G footprints were not known to
be so old, we would readily conclude that there

were made by a member of our genus Homo... In
3.6-million- any case, we should shelve the loose assump-
year-old
tion that the Laetoli footprints were made by
human foot-
prints found Lucy's kind, Australopithecus afarensis. 11
in Laetoli,
Tanzania.