Page 264 - Darwinism Refuted

DARWINISM REFUTED

The evolutionist hypothesis that prokaryotic cells (left) turned into eukaryotic
cells over time has no scientific basis to it.

(cyanobacteria, for instance), there is no chloroplast containing chlorophyll
and photosynthetic pigments. Rather, these molecules are buried in
various membranes all over the cell.
8- The biochemistry of messenger RNA formation in prokaryotic
(bacterial) cells and in eukaryotic (including plant and animal) cells are
quite different from one another. 321
Messenger RNA plays a vital role for the cell to live. But although
messenger RNA assumes the same vital role in both prokaryotic cells and
in eukaryotic cells, their biochemical structures are different. J. Darnell
wrote the following in an article published in Science:
The differences in the biochemistry of messenger RNA formation in
eukaryotes compared to prokaryotes are so profound as to suggest that
sequential prokaryotic to eukaryotic cell evolution seems unlikely. 322
The structural differences between bacterial and plant cells, of which
we have seen a few examples above, lead evolutionist scientists to another
dead-end. Although plant and bacterial cells have some aspects in
common, most of their structures are quite different from one another. In
fact, since there are no membrane-surrounded organelles or a cytoskeleton
(the internal network of protein filaments and microtubules) in bacterial
cells, the presence of several very complex organelles and cell organization
in plant cells totally invalidates the claim that the plant cell evolved from
the bacterial cell.
Biologist Ali Demirsoy openly admits this, saying, "Complex cells
never developed from primitive cells by a process of evolution." 323

262