Page 267 - Darwinism Refuted
P. 267

Harun Yahya (Adnan Oktar)


                 of analogy, random additions of sentences to the plays of Shakespeare are
                 not likely to improve them! …The principle that DNA changes are harmful
                 by virtue of reducing survival chances applies whether a change in DNA is
                 caused by a mutation or by some foreign genes we deliberately add to it. 328

                 The claims put forward by evolutionists are not based on scientific
             experiments, because no such thing as one bacterium swallowing another
             one has ever been observed. In his review of a later book by Margulis,
             Symbiosis in Cell Evolution, molecular biologist P. Whitfield describes the
             situation:
                 Prokaryotic endocytosis is the cellular mechanism on which the whole of
                 S.E.T. (Serial Endosymbiotic Theory) presumably rests. If one prokaryote
                 could not engulf another it is difficult to imagine how endosymbioses could
                 be set up. Unfortunately for Margulis and S.E.T., no modern examples of
                 prokaryotic endocytosis or endosymbiosis exist…  329


                 The Origin of Photosynthesis

                 Another matter regarding the origin of plants which puts the theory
             of evolution into a terrible quandary is the question of how plant cells
             began to carry out photosynthesis.
                 Photosynthesis is one of the fundamental processes of life on earth.
             By means of the chloroplasts inside them, plant cells produce starch by
             using water, carbon dioxide and sunlight. Animals are unable to produce
             their own nutrients and must use the starch from plants for food instead.
             For this reason, photosynthesis is a basic condition for complex life. An
             even more interesting side of the matter is the fact that this complex
             process of photosynthesis has not yet been fully understood. Modern
             technology has not yet been able to reveal all of its details, let alone
             reproduce it.
                 How is it that evolutionists believe such a complex process as
             photosynthesis is the product of natural and random processes?
                 According to the evolution scenario, in order to carry out
             photosynthesis, plant cells swallowed bacterial cells which could
             photosynthesize and turned them into chloroplasts. So, how did bacteria
             learn to carry out such a complex process as photosynthesis? And why
             had they not begun to carry out such a process before then? As with other


                                              265
   262   263   264   265   266   267   268   269   270   271   272