Page 190 - The Creation Of The Universe
P. 190
188 THE CREATION OF THE UNIVERSE
replication errors, as the "cause of favorable variations" in addition to nat-
ural mutation.
Today, the model that Darwinists espouse, despite their own awareness
of its scientific invalidity, is neo-Darwinism. The theory maintains that mil-
lions of living beings formed as a result of a process whereby numerous
complex organs of these organisms (e.g., ears, eyes, lungs, and wings) un-
derwent "mutations," that is, genetic disorders. Yet, there is an outright sci-
entific fact that totally undermines this theory: Mutations do not cause liv-
ing beings to develop; on the contrary, they are always harmful.
The reason for this is very simple: DNA has a very complex structure,
and random effects can only harm it. The American geneticist B. G.
Ranganathan explains this as follows:
First, genuine mutations are very rare in nature. Secondly, most mu-
tations are harmful since they are random, rather than orderly
changes in the structure of genes; any random change in a highly or-
dered system will be for the worse, not for the better. For example,
if an earthquake were to shake a highly ordered structure
such as a building, there would be a random change in the
framework of the building which, in all probability, would not
be an improvement. 114
Not surprisingly, no mutation example, which is useful, that is, which is
observed to develop the genetic code, has been observed so far. All muta-
tions have proved to be harmful. It was understood that mutation, which is
presented as an "evolutionary mechanism," is actually a genetic occurrence
that harms living things, and leaves them disabled. (The most common ef-
fect of mutation on human beings is cancer.) Of course, a destructive mech-
anism cannot be an "evolutionary mechanism." Natural selection, on the
other hand, "can do nothing by itself," as Darwin also accepted. This fact
shows us that there is no "evolutionary mechanism" in nature. Since
no evolutionary mechanism exists, no such imaginary process called "evo-
lution" could have taken place.