Page 194 - The Creation Of The Universe
P. 194
192 THE CREATION OF THE UNIVERSE
The above picture was drawn based on a single tooth and it was published in the
Illustrated London News of 24th July 1922. However, evolutionists were extremely disap-
pointed when it was revealed that this tooth belonged neither to an ape-like creature nor
to a man, but to an extinct species of pig.
more developed than Australopithecus. Evolutionists devise a fanciful evo-
lution scheme by arranging different fossils of these creatures in a particu-
lar order. This scheme is imaginary because it has never been proved that
there is an evolutionary relation between these different classes. Ernst Mayr,
one of the twentieth century's most important evolutionists, contends in his
book One Long Argument that "particularly historical [puzzles] such as the
origin of life or of Homo sapiens, are extremely difficult and may even re-
sist a final, satisfying explanation." 120
By outlining the link chain as Australopithecus > Homo habilis > Homo
erectus > Homo sapiens, evolutionists imply that each of these species is
one another's ancestor. However, recent findings of paleoanthropologists
have revealed that Australopithecus, Homo habilis, and Homo erectus lived
at different parts of the world at the same time. 121
Moreover, a certain segment of humans classified as Homo erectus have
lived up until very modern times. Homo sapiens neandarthalensis and
Homo sapiens sapiens (man) co-existed in the same region. 122