Page 61 - The Cambrian Evidence that Darwin Failed to Comprehend
P. 61

HARUN YAHYA

           were convinced that if there had been any ancestor anywhere, it would
           have been discovered by now.
                The claim that organisms from before the Cambrian had left be-
           hind no fossilized remains because they were small and soft-bodied is,
           as we have already seen, highly unrealistic. In order to see just how un-
           realistic it is, only consider the fact that microfossils of bacteria have
           been discovered in rocks dating back nearly 3 billion years. 34  In the
           Ediacaran period, therefore, had there existed living things with a soft
           structure and a complexity comparable to that of Cambrian life forms,
           they would inevitably have left traces in the fossil record. Yet the organ-
           isms we have from the Ediacaran consist of various multi-celled spe-
           cies, completely different from and independent of the phyla that
           would later emerge.
                And despite their being soft-bodied, these have left traces behind
           in the fossil record.
                Simon Conway-Morris had this to say on the subject:
                [German paleontologist Adolf] Seilacher has pioneered a radical alter-
                native. He suggests that the Ediacaran fossils are certainly not cnidar-
                ians, arthropods or annelids, and might not even be metazoans. One
                reason to think he might be correct is the highly anomalous preserva-
                tion of these fossils. Despite being almost entirely soft-bodied, the
                Ediacaran fossils are typically preserved in relatively coarse-grained
                sediments (siltstones and sandstones) deposited in shallow, turbulent
                water—the last place a paleontologist could normally expect or look
                for preservation of soft parts. 35
                In 1984, Natural History magazine published a long article by
           Stephen Jay Gould concerning the Ediacaran fossils in Australia. Gould
           stated that, as in the Cambrian, these life forms shared a basic mode of
           organization, with their unique characteristics. By the time Cambrian
           life forms emerged to replace Ediacaran ones, the latter had become ex-
           tinct. Therefore, Cambrian life forms were not more advanced forms of



                                    Adnan  Oktar


                                         59
   56   57   58   59   60   61   62   63   64   65   66