Page 34 - The Evolution Impasse 1
P. 34

32



                  This calculation was performed by  started to propose one new idea after
               the famous British mathematician Roger  another about the evolution of human
               Penrose, a colleague of Stephen Haw-  beings.
               king. In mathematics, Probabilities less  Scientists wanted to learn about the
               than 1 in 10 50  are regarded as essenti-  development of human societies, how
               ally zero. The number in question is a  they changed and became politically or-
               trillion, trillion, trillion times larger than  ganized, and how they developed art and
               1 in 10 50 —a number that shows that the  music. As a result of all their efforts, the
               universe cannot be accounted for in  science of anthropology developed va-
               terms of chance.                    rious branches of expertise in its study of
                  Roger Penrose comments on this in-  the history of humanity: physical anthro-
               conceivably vast number:            pology, cultural anthropology, and so
                                                   forth.
                  This now tells how precise the Creator's
                                                     But after Darwin proposed the theory
                  aim must have been, namely to an accu-
                                                   of evolution, cultural anthropology be-
                  racy of one part in 10 x 10123. This is an
                  extraordinary figure. One could not pos-  gan to study human beings as cultural
                  sibly even write the number down in full  animals, and physical anthropology in-
                  in the ordinary denary notation: it would  vestigated them as biological organisms.
                  be 1 followed by 10 123  successive 0's.  As a result of this distorted way of thin-
                  Even if we were to write a 0 on each se-  king, anthropology became the domain
                  parate proton and on each separate neut-  of evolutionist scientists, whose unre-
                  ron in the entire universe—and we could  alistic and partisan views prevailed.
                  throw in all the other particles for good
                  measure—we should fall far short of wri-
                  ting down the figure needed.  28  Antibiotic resistance

                                                     When any species of bacteria are
                                                   constantly exposed to a given antibiotic,
               Anthropology
                                                   later generations of them begin to show
                  Anthropology is the science that in-  resistance to it—and eventually that an-
               vestigates human origins together with  tibiotic has no further effect on them.
               its biological, social and cultural charac-  Evolutionists assume that bacteria’s de-
               teristics. This science began with the im-  veloping resistance to antibiotics is pro-
               petus to learn about human history; in  of for evolution. They say that this resis-
               fact, its Greek roots mean the science of  tance develops as a result of mutations
               human beings. After Charles Darwin es-  that occur in the bacteria.
               tablished his evolutionary theory of the  However, this increasing resistance
               origins and development of living things  is not the result of bacterial mutations.
               in the 19 th  century, interested scientists  Bacteria had resistance ability before be-

                                                      THE EVOLUTION IMPASSE I
   29   30   31   32   33   34   35   36   37   38   39