Page 38 - The Evolution Impasse 1
P. 38

36



               tedly interpreted the data. 32      yed by evolutionists were valid, then
                  Basic proteins are essential molecu-  man would have a much closer relative
               les commonly found in many other li-  than the chimpanzee—the potato! Both
               ving things. The structures of the prote-  human beings and potatoes have exactly
               ins in all living things, not just of chim-  the same number of chromosomes: 46.
               panzees, bear a close similarity to those  These examples demonstrate that the
               of proteins in human beings.        concept of genetic similarity constitutes
                  For example, genetic analyses repor-  no evidence for the theory of evolution.
               ted in New Scientist revealed a 75% si-  Not only are the genetic similarities in-
               milarity between the DNA of nematodes  compatible with the evolutionary family
               (millimeter-long worms that dwell in the  tree proposed, but they actually provide
               soil) and humans! 33  This, of course,  totally conflicting results.
               does not imply that there is only a 25%  In addition, the similarities discove-
               difference between human beings and  red are actually evidence for creation
               nematodes.                          rather than for evolution. It is perfectly
                  When the genes of the fruit fly speci-  natural for the bodies of humans and ot-
               es Drosophila were compared with hu-  her living things to exhibit molecular si-
               man genes, a 60% similarity was deter-  milarities, because all living things are
               mined.  34                          made up of the same molecules, use the
                  Analyses of some proteins seem to  same water and atmosphere, and consu-
               show that man is actually closer to very  me foods made up of the same molecu-
               different living things. In one study per-  les. Naturally, their metabolisms—and
               formed at Cambridge University, certain  thus, their genetic structures—will tend
               proteins in terrestrial organisms were  to resemble one another. However, this
               compared. Astonishingly, in almost all  is no evidence that they evolved from a
               the specimens involved, human beings  common ancestor.
               and chickens were found to bear the clo-  Another example will help elucidate
               sest relationship to one another. Our next  this: All the buildings in the world are
               closest relative is the lizard. 35  constructed from similar materials—
                  Another example used by evolutio-  bricks, iron, cement, and so forth. But
               nists with regard to the so-called “gene-  this does not imply that these buildings
               tic similarity between man and ape” is  evolved from one another. They were bu-
               that there are 46 chromosomes in human  ilt independently, using common materi-
               beings and 48 in gorillas. Evolutionists  als. The same principle applies to living
               assume that chromosome numbers are  things.
               an indication of an evolutionary relati-  Apart from the superficial similarity
               onship. But in fact, if this logic emplo-  between human beings and apes, there is
                                                   no question of their being closer to each

                                                      THE EVOLUTION IMPASSE I
   33   34   35   36   37   38   39   40   41   42   43