Page 155 - What Darwinists Fail To Consider

Adnan Oktar

known, of formations rich in fossils beneath
Cambrian strata—are undoubtedly of the most seri-
ous nature.” 45
Richard Ellis, evolutionist marine biologist
Darwinists never realize that far from
proving their own claims, the fossils of complex in-
vertebrates such as snails, trilobites, sponges, sea
urchins, crustaceans and sea lilies in Cambrian rock
beds prove that living things appeared suddenly and
with no forebears before them, and that they demolish the
myth of Darwin’s evolutionary tree.

There is no need to apologize any longer for the poverty of the fossil record. In
some ways, it has become almost unmanageably rich, and discovery is outpacing
integration. . . . The fossil record nevertheless continues to be composed mainly
of gaps. 46
T. Neville George, professor of Paleontology

Darwinists never realize that these words, “This follows from
the extreme difficulty or rather impossibility of conceiving this immense and
wonderful universe, including man, with his capacity of looking far backward
and far into futurity, as the result of blind chance or necessity.” actually be-
long to Charles Darwin. 47
Darwinists claim that there are functionless vestigial organs in
the human body and those of other living things, but never realize that
such organs are a misinterpretation that arose from the medical igno-
rance in the past. These organs, regarded as vestigial by Darwin and his
followers, actually have very important functions.
Darwinists even maintained that a large part of DNA was
functionless junk. Yet they never admit that these past claims too
stemmed from scientific ignorance. With advances in genetics, the func-
tions of these genes have been revealed.
Darwinists imagine that variations within living species, such
as the different beak structures among the finches living on the

153