Page 129 - The Evolution Impasse 2
P. 129

Origin of Reptiles  127



           pho to syn thet ic bac te ria (cy an o bac te -  pos si ble for the plant cell to have
           ria, for in stance), chlo ro phyll and  evolved from a bac te ri um.
           pig ments do not ex ist. These are dis -  Professor Demirsoy ac tu al ly ad -
           trib ut ed through out the cell, con -  mits this: "Complex cells nev er de -
           cealed in var i ous mem branes.     vel oped from prim i tive cells by a
              ● The mes sen ger RNAs in the    proc ess of ev o lu tion."  134
           bac te ri um and in the larg er plant
           and an i mal cells are very dif fer ent
           from one an oth er in terms of bi o -  ORIGIN OF REPTILES
           chem i cal struc ture.  132           Creatures such as di no saurs, liz -
              Messenger RNA per forms a func -  ards, tor tois es and croc o diles all be -
           tion that is vi tal to the cell's sur viv al.  long to the rep tile fam i ly. Reptiles
           However, al though mes sen ger RNA  pos sess unique char ac ter is tics: They
           plays the same es sen tial role in both  are all cov ered in scales. They are
           eu kar y ot ic and prok ar y ot ic cells, it  cold-blood ed and can not pro duce
           has a dif fer ent bi o chem i cal struc ture  their own body heat, for which rea -
           in each. Darnell writes on this sub -  son they need to warm their bod ies
           ject in an ar ti cle in Science mag a zine:   in the Sun ev ery day. Their young
              The dif fer en ces in the bi o chem is try of  hatch from eggs.
              mes sen ger RNA for ma tion in eu kar y o -  Evolution  the o ry  fa ces  an oth er
              tes com pared to prok ar y o tes are so pro -  ma jor di lem ma in ex plain ing the or -
              found as to sug gest that se quen tial  i gin of these crea tures. Darwinists
              prok ar y ot ic to eu kar y ot ic cell ev o lu tion
                                               claim that rep tiles evolved from am -
              seems un like ly.  133
                                               phib i ans, yet no con crete ev i dence
              The enor mous struc tur al dif fer -  sup ports this. On the con tra ry, a
           en ces  be tween  bac te ria  and  plant  com par i son of rep tiles and am phib i -
           cells, of which we have list ed a few  ans shows enor mous phys i o log i cal
           ex am ples, rep re sent a ma jor im passe  dif fer en ces be tween the two groups,
           for ev o lu tion ist bi ol o gists. Some bac -  and that any half-rep tile, half-am -
           te ria and plant cells do have some  phib i an would stand no chance of
           fea tures in com mon, but these struc -  sur viv al.
           tures  are  gen er al ly  very  dif fer ent  One rea son con cerns the two
           from one an oth er. These dif fer en ces,  groups' dif fer ent egg struc tures.
           and the im pos si bil i ty of any func -  Amphibians de pos it their eggs in
           tion al in ter me di ate form, make it im -  wa ter, and they are ide al ly suit ed to


           Harun Yahya - Adnan Oktar
   124   125   126   127   128   129   130   131   132   133   134