Page 129 - The Evolution Impasse 2
P. 129
Origin of Reptiles 127
pho to syn thet ic bac te ria (cy an o bac te - pos si ble for the plant cell to have
ria, for in stance), chlo ro phyll and evolved from a bac te ri um.
pig ments do not ex ist. These are dis - Professor Demirsoy ac tu al ly ad -
trib ut ed through out the cell, con - mits this: "Complex cells nev er de -
cealed in var i ous mem branes. vel oped from prim i tive cells by a
● The mes sen ger RNAs in the proc ess of ev o lu tion." 134
bac te ri um and in the larg er plant
and an i mal cells are very dif fer ent
from one an oth er in terms of bi o - ORIGIN OF REPTILES
chem i cal struc ture. 132 Creatures such as di no saurs, liz -
Messenger RNA per forms a func - ards, tor tois es and croc o diles all be -
tion that is vi tal to the cell's sur viv al. long to the rep tile fam i ly. Reptiles
However, al though mes sen ger RNA pos sess unique char ac ter is tics: They
plays the same es sen tial role in both are all cov ered in scales. They are
eu kar y ot ic and prok ar y ot ic cells, it cold-blood ed and can not pro duce
has a dif fer ent bi o chem i cal struc ture their own body heat, for which rea -
in each. Darnell writes on this sub - son they need to warm their bod ies
ject in an ar ti cle in Science mag a zine: in the Sun ev ery day. Their young
The dif fer en ces in the bi o chem is try of hatch from eggs.
mes sen ger RNA for ma tion in eu kar y o - Evolution the o ry fa ces an oth er
tes com pared to prok ar y o tes are so pro - ma jor di lem ma in ex plain ing the or -
found as to sug gest that se quen tial i gin of these crea tures. Darwinists
prok ar y ot ic to eu kar y ot ic cell ev o lu tion
claim that rep tiles evolved from am -
seems un like ly. 133
phib i ans, yet no con crete ev i dence
The enor mous struc tur al dif fer - sup ports this. On the con tra ry, a
en ces be tween bac te ria and plant com par i son of rep tiles and am phib i -
cells, of which we have list ed a few ans shows enor mous phys i o log i cal
ex am ples, rep re sent a ma jor im passe dif fer en ces be tween the two groups,
for ev o lu tion ist bi ol o gists. Some bac - and that any half-rep tile, half-am -
te ria and plant cells do have some phib i an would stand no chance of
fea tures in com mon, but these struc - sur viv al.
tures are gen er al ly very dif fer ent One rea son con cerns the two
from one an oth er. These dif fer en ces, groups' dif fer ent egg struc tures.
and the im pos si bil i ty of any func - Amphibians de pos it their eggs in
tion al in ter me di ate form, make it im - wa ter, and they are ide al ly suit ed to
Harun Yahya - Adnan Oktar