Page 60 - The Dark Clan

58

The Dark Clan

P
A
E

A
R
F
H
E
T THEFT, RAPE AND HOMOSEXUALITY

,
T
N
A
U
X
L
Y
T
I
E
H

D
O
O
S
M
inker's arguments in relation to the baby murders are
only one of the pro-crime tendencies of Darwinism.
P They argue for many other acts which are acknowl-
edged by conventional wisdom as crimes, to be perceived as
normal. The evolutionists' illogical argument holds that any-
one committing a crime like murder, theft or rape etc. is in real-
ity not guilty of the crime because he lags behind in the process
of evolution, and that this circumstance must be taken into ac-
count when sentencing. At the bottom of this unscientific argu-
ment lies the error that we carry genes derived from primates
and that these will cause us to display animal behaviour. The
famous evolutionist of the recent past, Stephen Jay Gould
summarises this logic common to many evolutionists:
We may be clothed, citified, and civilised, but we carry deep
within us the genetic patterns of behaviour that served our
ancestor, the "killer ape." 19
Some evolutionists go as far as to suggest that even rape
should be considered normal. In the recently published
Natural History of Rape the evolutionary scientists Randy
Thornhill and Craig Palmer argue that rape committed by
man, who is still equipped with animal instincts, should be
considered normal. According to this perverse claim it is nor-
mal behaviour for man as a species of animal, to occasionally
commit rape like his primate ancestors did and that this act

may even be essential for the continuation of the species:
We fervently believe that, just as the leopard's spots and the
giraffe's elongated neck are the results of aeons of past
Darwinian selection, so is rape… There is no doubt that rape
has evolutionary — and hence genetic — origins. 20