Page 69 - The Intellectual Struggle Against Darwinism

HARUN YAHYA 67

Professor Fred Hoyle, Cambridge University mathematician and as-
tronomer:
Indeed, such a theory [that life was assembled by an Intelligence] is
so obvious that one wonders why it is not widely accepted as being
self- evident. The reasons are psychological rather than scientific. 10
Stephen Jay Gould, Professor of Geology and Paleoanthropology at
Harvard University and one of the foremost spokesmen for evolution in
the second half of the 20 th century:
What has become of our ladder if there are three coexisting lineages
of hominids (A. africanus, the robust australopithecines, and H. habilis),
none clearly derived from another? Moreover, none of the three dis-
play any evolutionary trends during their tenure on earth. 11
D. L. Stern, evolutionist zoologist:
One of the oldest problems in evolutionary biology remains largely
unsolved. Which mutations generate evolutionarily relevant pheno-
typic variation? What kinds of molecular changes do they entail? 12
B. G. Ranganathan:
There is no evidence in the fossil record of one kind of creature be-
coming another kind. No transitional links or intermediate forms be-
tween various kinds of creatures have ever been found… And this is
true between every major plant and animal kind. 13
Dr. Albert Fleischman, evolutionist zoologist:
The Darwinian theory of descent has not a single fact to confirm it in
the realm of nature. It is not the result of scientific research, but pure-
ly the product of imagination. 14
Norman Macbeth:
Unfortunately, in the field of evolution most explanations are not
good. As a matter of fact, they hardy qualify as explanations at all;
they are suggestions, hunches, pipe dreams, hardy worthy of being
called hypotheses. 15

O

k
a
t
d
A Adnan Oktar r
n
n
a