Page 206 - The Errors the American National Academy of Sciences

The Errors of the American National Academy of Sciences

dled with contradictions and problems. Scientific American devoted
some space to this problem in its August 1999 issue, noting that ". . .
the significance of each finding has been questioned," referring to the
methods on which these hypotheses are based. 21
In conclusion, all we have are hypotheses, assumptions, and sce-

narios based on a very very sparse and controversial fossil record.
The theory of evolution is unable to answer such fundamental ques-
tions as how life emerged on Earth or how different groups of living
things came into being. It is at a total loss in the face of the different
species that appear suddenly in the fossil record, as it is when con-
fronted with the complex designs in living things. The proponents of
evolution, therefore, speak not of basic and concrete facts, but rather
of invented
and mutually

contradictory
evolutionary
scenarios. In
this way, they
attempt to
conceal the
fact that there

is absolutely
no scientific
evidence to
support the
theory of evo-
lution, which
has now come
to the end of
its road.

204