Page 106 - Confessions of the Evolutionists

104

CHAPTER 14.
CHAPTER 14.

EVOLUTIONISTS' CONFESSIONS
REGARDING THE INVALIDITY OF
THE HORSE SERIES

U ntil recently, the imaginary sequence showing the supposed
U

evolution of the horse headed the list of fossil chronologies
portrayed as evidence for the theory of evolution. However,
many evolutionists now openly admit that the horse-evolution scenario is

a fabrication.
The equine evolution scenario was proposed on the basis of evolu-
tionists' imaginations with invented sequences of fossils, set out in order
of size, belonging to different life forms that lived at different times in
India, North America, South America and Europe. Various researchers
have proposed more than twenty different equine evolution sequences.
There is absolutely no consensus regarding these completely different al-

leged lines of descent. The only thing these sequences have in common is
the belief that the first ancestor of the horse was a relatively small dog-like
animal known as Eohippus (Hyracotherium) that lived in the Eocene period
some 55 million years ago. In fact, however, Eohippus, which supposedly
became extinct millions of years ago, is in fact identical to the animal
known as the hyrax, which is still to be found in Africa today, which has
nothing to do with the horse and bears no resemblance to it.
The inconsistency of the idea of equine evolution is becoming more
and more apparent with every new fossil discovery. It has been estab-

lished that fossils of horse breeds living today (Equus nevadensis and E. oc-
cidentalis) have been found in the same strata as Eohippus. This shows