Page 110 - Confessions of the Evolutionists
P. 110

108




                      CHAPTER 15.
                      CHAPTER 15.





                      EVOLUTIONISTS' CONFESSIONS
                        REGARDING THE SO-CALLED
                             FOREBEARERS OF MAN



             T           he theory of evolution maintains that human beings and pre-
              T


                         sent-day apes share an imaginary common ancestor.
                         According to evolutionists, these imaginary primitive crea-
              tures gradually evolved, with one branch coming to form present-day

              apes, and the other group present-day human beings.
                   Evolutionists point to Australopithecus, whose Latin name means
              "South African ape," as the first supposed common ancestor between hu-
              mans and apes. The various types of Australopithecus were in fact nothing
              more than an extinct species of ape. Some of these were very large and
              others much smaller, while other had more delicate features.
                   Evolutionists attach the prefix Homo, meaning "man," to the next

              stage, or genus, of imaginary human evolution. They claim that creatures
              in the Homo sequence were more advanced than Australopithecus and not
              all that different from present-day humans. The final stage of this sup-
              posed evolutionary process is Homo sapiens sapiens, today’s man. Of
              course, this complete story is a fairly comprehensive deceit.
                   The facts, however, are that Australopithecus is an extinct species of
              ape, while those in the Neanderthal and early Homo series are races of hu-
              man beings who once lived but have since become extinct. Evolutionists
              have set out various ape and human fossils in order of size to produce a

              chronology of human evolution. Yet scientific facts prove that these fossils
              do not prove any evolutionary process: Some of these entities depicted as
   105   106   107   108   109   110   111   112   113   114   115