Page 112 - Confessions of the Evolutionists

110 CONFESSIONS OF THE EVOLUTIONISTS

in question are intended solely as speculation. All the fossils discovered

belong to perfect life forms.
The claim of human evolution is even regarded as groundless by the
people involved in shaping it. The claim is based, not on science, but on
the beliefs and prejudices that shape the theory. But the interesting thing
is how these “admissions” from the world of paleoanthropology are nev-

er reflected in the press. On the contrary, one part of the media that sup-
ports Darwinism is careful to conceal this predicament facing the theory
of evolution and deceives the public by telling them that “new evidence
for evolution is being discovered every day.”
A great many evolutionists, beginning with Charles Darwin himself,
have generally had to admit that the commonest subject for speculation
are the claims regarding fictitious primitive man.
Charles Darwin:

You ask whether I shall discuss "man";-I think I shall avoid whole sub-
ject... My work, on which I have now been at work more or less for 20
years, will not fix or settle anything... 272
... but I was dreadfully disappointed about [the evolution of] Man. 273

Richard Leakey - Roger Lewin (after a lengthy exposition of hy-
potheses regarding human evolution):
Isolated teeth, single bones, fragments of skulls: for the most part, these
are the clues from which the story of human prehistory must be recon-
structed. 274
Dr. Robert Martin is senior research fellow at the Zoological
Society of London:
In recent years several authors have written popular books on human ori-
gins which were based more on fantasy and subjectivity than on fact and
objectivity. At the moment science cannot offer a full answer on the origin
of humanity, but scientific method takes us closer to the truth... 275
Richard Leakey, a well-known evolutionist:
David Pilbeam [a well-known expert in human evolution] comments
wryly, “If you brought in a smart scientist from another discipline and