Page 111 - Confessions of the Evolutionists
P. 111
Harun Yahya (Adnan Oktar) 109
the forerunners of present-day humans were genuine apes, while others
were genuine humans. (For more details, see The Evolution Deceit, by
Harun Yahya.)
However, since evolutionists had made such a daring claim, they
needed to prove it, at least in their own minds, and so attempt to present
so-called evidence by resorting to various frauds.
In their search for evidence to substantiate the theory of evolution,
they most frequently resort to the fossil record. But when examined care-
fully and objectively, the fossil record does not support the theory of evo-
lution at all, but totally undermines it. Yet because evolutionists general-
ly offer biased evaluations of fossils and pass them on to the public, many
people imagine that the fossil record actually corroborates the theory of
evolution. Yet even though 99% of the fossil record has been unearthed
and catalogued, evolutionists still do not have a single piece of evidence
to support their claims. For that reason, some evolutionists have attempt-
ed to manufacture their own fossils as alleged evidence for their theories,
though subsequently these "remains" have been exposed as either hoaxes
or distorted misinterpretations. Fossils in the Earth’s strata today confirm
that living things have existed in perfect form ever since they were first
created. Evolutionists construct their imaginary reconstructions (models
or drawings) on the basis of fossil remains in such a way as to corroborate
the claims of evolution. Since people are most easily influenced by visual
materials, their aim is to use imagination to convince people that such
creatures actually once existed. The fact is that nothing like those crea-
tures in these pictures ever existed.
Evolutionist researchers generally produce their reconstructions of
imaginary, human-like beings on the basis of a single tooth, fragment of
jawbone, or a tiny arm bone and then sensationally declare these to be
links in the story of human evolution. Such drawings have played a con-
siderable role in forming the public's image of imaginary "primitive man".
The fact is, however, that no such primitive man ever lived. The pictures