Page 170 - Once Upon a Time There Was Darwinism

In other words, the scientific explanations relevant to the
mutation are completely ignored, because if these details are
examined, it will appear that they are merely unscientific su-

perstitions.
The evolutionists' just-so stories suppose that mutations
will appear to supply whatever an organism needs and to en-
sure whatever advantages would suit it best.
Once Upon a Time There Was Darwinism
Moreover, no mutation has been observed so far that de-
velops genetic data.
To believe in this scenario is like believing in a magic

wand that supplies a creature's every need. It is superstition.
Even though the French zoologist Pierre-Paul Grassé
theoretically accepts evolution, he is aware of the reality of
the situation and has come out strongly against Darwinism in
describing its strange belief about mutations:
The opportune appearance of mutations permitting animals
and plants to meet their needs seems hard to believe. Yet the
Darwinian theory is even more demanding. A single plant, a
single animal would require thousands and thousands of . . .
appropriate events. Thus, miracles would become the rule:
events with an infinitesimal probability could not fail to occur.
. . There is no law against daydreaming, but science must not
indulge in it. 119
In short, Darwinism is a figment of the imagination with
nothing to do with science. And the just-so stories presented
as scientific fact have not the slightest scientific support.
All these myths have in common the supposition that liv-
ing things' special needs are first determined and then sup-
plied by mutations. Evolutionists call this need "evolutionary

168