Page 30 - New Research Demolishes Evolution

To attempt to restore the soft parts is an even more hazardous undertaking. The lips,
the eyes, the ears, and the nasal tip leave no clues on the underlying bony parts. You
can with equal facility model on a Neanderthaloid skull the features of a chim-
panzee or the lineaments of a philosopher. These alleged restorations of ancient
types of man have very little if any scientific value and are likely only to mislead
the public… So put not your trust in reconstructions. 44
As a matter of fact, evolutionists invent such "preposterous stories" that they even
ascribe different faces to the same skull. For example, the three different reconstructed
drawings made for the fossil named Australopithecus robustus (Zinjanthropus), is a
famous example of such a forgery.
The biased interpretation of fossils or fabrication of many imaginary reconstructions
may be an indication of how frequently evolutionists have recourse to tricks. Yet these
seem innocent when compared to the deliberate forgeries that have been perpetrated in
the history of evolution.

National Geographic, March 1996
Junior Larousse Encyclopaedia, vol 1 p. 96
IMAGINARY DRAWINGS: In their pictures
and reconstructions, evolutionists deliberately
give shape to features that do not actually leave
any fossil traces, such as the structure of the
nose and lips, the shape of the hair, the form of
the eyebrows, and other bodily hair so as to sup-
port evolution. They also prepare detailed pic-
tures depicting these imaginary creatures walk-
ing with their families, hunting, or in other
instances of their daily lives. However, these
drawings are all figments of the imagination and
have no counterpart in the fossil record.
Geheimnisse Der Urzeit, Tiere und Menschen, p. 200