Page 35 - New Research Demolishes Evolution
P. 35

AUSTRALOPITHECUS-CHIMPANZEE RESEMBLANCE














                 The great similarity between  Australopithecus (left) and Chimpanzee (right)
                 skulls clearly indicate that Australopithecus, the alleged ancestor of man, is in
                 reality only an ape species.

             The movements of apes and men are completely different. Human beings are the only
          living creatures that move freely about on two feet. Some other animals do have a limit-
          ed ability to move in this way, but those that do have bent skeletons.
             According to evolutionists, these living beings called Australopithecus had the abili-
          ty to walk in a bent rather than an upright posture like human beings. Even this limited
          bipedal stride was sufficient to encourage evolutionists to project onto these creatures
          that they were the ancestors of man.
             However, the first evidence refuting the allegations of evolutionists that
          Australopithecus were bipedal came from evolutionists themselves. Detailed studies
          made on Australopithecus fossils forced even evolutionists to admit that these looked
          "too" ape-like. Having conducted detailed anatomical research on Australopithecus fos-
          sils in the mid-1970s, Charles E. Oxnard likened the skeletal structure of Australopithecus
          to that of modern orang-utans:
             An important part of today's conventional wisdom about human evolution is based
             on studies of teeth, jaws and skull fragments of australopithecine fossils. These all
             indicate that the close relation of the australopithecine to the human lineage may not
             be true. All these fossils are different from gorillas, chimpanzees and men. Studied as
             a group, the australopithecine seems more like the orang-utan. 50
             What really embarrassed evolutionists was the discovery that  Austra-lopithecus
          could not have walked on two feet and with a bent posture. It would have been physi-
          cally very ineffective for Australopithecus, allegedly bipedal but with a bent stride, to
          move about in such a way because of the enormous energy demands it would have
          entailed. By means of computer simulations conducted in 1996, the English paleoanthro-
          pologist Robin Crompton also demonstrated that such a "compound" stride was impos-


                 HARUN YAHYA
                                                                          33
   30   31   32   33   34   35   36   37   38   39   40