Page 94 - The Evolution Deceit

92 THE EVOLUTION DECEIT

THREE DIF FER ENT RE CON STRUC TIONS
BASED ON THE SAME SKULL

IMAGINARY
DRAWING

Appeared in Sunday Maurice Wilson's N.Parker's reconstruc-
Times, April 5, 1964 drawing tion, N. Geographic,
September 1960

the features of a chimpanzee or the lineaments of a philosopher. These al-
leged restorations of ancient types of man have very little if any scientific
value and are likely only to mislead the public… So put not your trust in
reconstructions. 63
As a matter of fact, evolutionists invent such "preposterous stories"
that they even ascribe different faces to the same skull. For example, the
three different reconstructed drawings made for the fossil named Aus-
tralopithecus robustus (Zinjanthropus), are a famous example of such
forgery.
The biased interpretation of fossils and outright fabrication of many
imaginary reconstructions are an indication of how frequently evolution-
ists have recourse to tricks. Yet these seem innocent when compared to the
deliberate forgeries that have been perpetrated in the history of evolution.

Two drawings of Java Man,
which are totally different
from each other, provide a
good example of how fan-
tastically fossils are inter-
preted by evolutionists.

IMAGINARY IMAGINARY
Left: Maurice Wilson’s draw-
DRAWING ing (From Ape to Adam: The DRAWING
Search for the Ancestry of
Man, Herbert Wendth)
Right: Steven Stanley's draw-
ing (Human Origins)