Page 191 - If Darwin Had Known about DNA

Adnan Oktar

189

Nucleotides
technological equip-
ment, in specially regulated
environments.

Despite being an evolutionist,
Chromatin Professor of Biology William D.
Stansfield cites an example of cell
synthesis in the laboratory to show
Histones
that studies of this kind cannot repre-
sent proof of evolution:
Creationists have looked forward to the day
when science may actually create a "living"
thing from simple chemicals. They claim, and rightly
so, that even if such a man-made life form could be created, this would
not prove that natural life forms were developed by a similar chemical
evolutionary process. 130

2) Genetic variations provides no support for the theory of evo-
lution
Contrary to what is claimed in evolutionist publications, experi-
ments resulting in genetic variation are no evidence for the theory of
evolution. The theory of evolution maintains that there are mechanisms
in nature that turn living things into more complex ones, by which
means one species turns into another. In fact, experiments in the field
of genetic engineering and biotechnology have demonstrated that it is
impossible for genetic variation to give rise to any change of species.
Some evolutionists ignore this, however, playing with words to make
unrealistic claims that the theory of evolution has been proven in the
laboratory.
3) Organisms developed using genetic engineering are no evi-
dence for the theory of evolution.
Another error is the claim that new organisms developed through
genetic engineering confirm the theory of evolution. The methods cur-