Page 193 - If Darwin Had Known about DNA

Adnan Oktar

191

solely through chance mechanisms, evolutionist interpretations of ge-
netic engineering are flawed from the outset. In their claims concerning
genetic engineering, evolutionists exhibit a serious contradiction.

Attempts are made to use the fact that genes can be transferred be-
tween different organisms, or that genes can be recombined, as evi-
dence of an evolutionary process. But as you have seen in previous sec-
tions, genes' highly complex structures are a most powerful proof that
no such random process ever took place.
4) Genes show that living things share a common origin, not a
common ancestor.
Another of the errors in the evolutionist propaganda regarding
this research is that common genes that can be transferred between or-
ganisms prove the claim that living things are descended from a com-
mon ancestor. After describing how they are able to transfer genes be-
tween different species, Darwinist researchers then go on to claim
that they can do so because the living things are descended from
a common ancestor. People with a superficial knowledge of the

subject are misled by the way analysis based on evolutionists'
assumptions is portrayed as proof.
In fact, a common origin constitutes no evidence for a
common ancestor. Nor does the fact that genes can be
transferred among different organisms prove that
biologic structures evolved by chance,
through haphazard natural events.
Objectively, the common genes in dif-
ferent organisms may be regarded
as an indication of common
origin-which clearly sup-
ports the fact of creation.