Page 233 - If Darwin Had Known about DNA
P. 233

Adnan Oktar


                                            231


                  In the same way that it is impossible for a book to aim at increas-
             ing its numbers by way of reproduction, to be selfish, or to possess con-

             sciousness in any way, so it is impossible for DNA-a chain of molecu-
             les consisting of unconscious and inanimate atoms, and no molecule
             possesses intelligence and awareness.
                  In addition, the Israeli scientist Gerald L. Schroeder notes that the
             way that a cell passes on a strand of its DNA by dividing is actually al-
             truistic behavior, rather than selfishness:
                  One of the puzzles of meiosis is the altruistic nature of the cell. Why

                  should a cell willingly give up half of its chromosomal information, and
                  thereby essentially guarantee that its progeny will not be an identical
                  copy of itself? I would have thought that altruism stops at self-destruc-
                  tion. A parent's mixing its chromosomes with those of another is, in a
                  sense, self destruction, since the parent will not be reproduced in the
                  child. Not a very selfish way for a potentially selfish gene to act. 173
                  Therefore, the idea of the selfish gene has nothing to do with the
             true facts, and the claim is no more than a fantasy. Darwinist thinking-
             which describes human beings as animals and regards them as mere ro-
             bots that carry genes and are responsible for passing those genes on to
             the next generation-is mainly responsible for the acts of violence, gen-
             ocide, oppression and moral degeneration that increased enormously
             during the 20 th century. Such a perspective endows all oppression, ag-
             gression and immorality with apparent scientific legitimacy. Even

             Hitler, who perpetrated the worst slaughter of the 20 th century, regard-
             ed Darwinism as supporting him. It was Darwinism that justified his
             oppression and aggression. Hitler regarded all races other than the al-
             leged Master Race as unworthy of living and regarded their slaughter
             as no more reprehensible than killing an animal.
                  Darwinism, maintaining that human beings are genetically ag-
             gressive, ruthless, competitive, selfish and potential murderers, is non-
             sense used to justify crimes of all kinds. All human beings bear the
   228   229   230   231   232   233   234   235   236   237   238