Page 253 - If Darwin Had Known about DNA

Adnan Oktar

251

the growth sequence, and for the effector mechanism translating instruc-
tions into growth-all had to be simultaneously present at that moment
[when life began]. This combination of events has seemed an incredibly
unlikely happenstance. . . . 197

Prof. Jacobson wrote these statements two years after James
Watson and Francis Crick discovered the structure of DNA. However,
despite all the scientific advances that have been made, this problem
still remains insoluble for evolutionists. The Turkish evolutionist biolo-
gist Prof. Ali Demirsoy was forced to make this admission regarding
the probability of protein and DNA coming into being together:

The probability of a protein and nucleic acid (DNA-RNA) is one far ex-
ceeding probability estimates. The chances of a specific protein chain
emerging are so small as to be astronomical. 198
The probability Demirsoy referred is in practice zero. In a 1994 ar-
ticle, the evolutionist Dr. Leslie Orgel said this in the face of that:

It is extremely improbable that proteins and nucleic acids, both of which
are structurally complex, arose spontaneously in the same place at the
same time. Yet it also seems impossible to have one without the other.
And so, at first glance, one might have to conclude that life could never,
in fact, have originated by chemical means. 199
To say that "it is extremely improbable for life to originate by
chemical means" means that it is impossible for life to emerge spontaneous-
ly. This is proof that life was created in a single moment. However, ev-
olutionists are reluctant to accept this fact, whose proof they can clear-

ly see, for ideological reasons. They advocate nonsensical scenarios,
which they themselves know to be impossible, in order not to have to
admit the existence of Allah.
Another evolutionist, Caryl P. Haskins, expresses the impossibili-
ty of the DNA code forming by chance and sees this as a powerful evi-
dence for creation: