Page 95 - Death of the Darwinist Dajjal System

Adnan Oktar (Harun Yahya)

ted that all the fossils depicted to date as evidence for so-called evolu-
tion, in fact constituted no evidence for human evolution, and that
Darwinists actually had no corroborative finds in the area at all:

This presents the public for the first time with the notion that there are no
actual fossils directly ancestral to man. [This is] What the creationists
have insisted on for years ... 36
The biologist Lyall Watson also says that Darwinists have not un-
earthed a single fossil that might prove the supposed evolution of man:
Modern apes, for instance, seem to have sprung out of nowhere. They
have no yesterday, no fossil record. And the true origin of modern hu-
mans--of upright, naked, toolmaking, big-brained beings--is, if we are to

be honest with ourselves, an equally mysterious matter. 37
No matter how reluctant Lyall Watson may be to openly state the
case, referring to the origin of man as “a mysterious matter,” the origins
of man are actually abundantly clear: Allah created man like all other
living things, and concrete scientific findings confirm this. In addition
to all this, Darwinists are always confronted by the dating problem

with every new fossil that is unearthed. They constantly have to “set
back” the dates they have dreamed up for evolution and to alter their
claims as they see how fossils refute evolution. For example, the fact
that 200-million-year-old human footprints were found in one stratum
alongside human bones in strata dating back to the Cretaceous Period
(144 to 65 million years) shows that human beings go back at least 100 mil-
lion years. 38 Given that evolutionists assume a period of 50,000 years
since human beings first appeared, we are most definitely looking at a
major discrepancy. New fossils reported in August 2007 showed that

the life forms called Homo Erectus and Homo Habilis by Darwinists in
fact lived at the same time. The dating problem is yet another factor
that leaves Darwinists in a hopeless dilemma when it comes to the so-
called evolution of man.

93