Page 51 - The Transitional Form Dilemma
P. 51

HARUN YAHYA





                   Attempts to Salvage Darwinism in
                   Attempts to Salvage Darwinism in
                   the Face of the Cambrian Explosion
                   the Face of the Cambrian Explosi ion
                   Despite Darwin’s knowledge that fossils of “new” species ap-
              peared suddenly during the Cambrian Period, the full importance and
              scope of the matter was not realized until 1980. However, when by the
              paleontologists Harry B.  Whittington, Derek Briggs and Simon
              Conway Morris re-examined fossils found in the Burgess Shale in
              Canada’s British Columbia, the Cambrian explosion came to light. The
              1980s also saw the discovery of two new fossil regions resembling the
              Burgess Shale: Sirius Passet in Northern Greenland and Chengjiang in
              Southern China. Fossils of utterly different living things that first
              emerged during the Cambrian period were found in both these regions.

              The Chengjiang fossils were the oldest and best-preserved of these, and
              also contain the first vertebrates.
                   In its February 1999 edition, the well-known scientific publication
              Trends in Genetics (TIG) discussed the Burgess Shale fossil discoveries
              and accepted that they could not possibly be explained in terms of the
              theory of evolution:
                   It might seem odd that fossils from one small locality, no matter how exciting,
                   should lie at the center of a fierce debate about such broad issues in evolution-
                   ary biology. The reason is that animals burst into the fossil record in astonish-
                   ing profusion during the Cambrian, seemingly from nowhere. Increasingly
                   precise radiometric dating and new fossil discoveries have only sharpened the
                   suddenness and scope of this biological revolution. The magnitude of this
                   change in Earth’s biota demands an explanation. Although many hypotheses
                   have been proposed, the general consensus is that none is wholly convincing. 16

                   These ideas, none of which “is wholly convincing,” are those of
              evolutionist paleontologists, who offer forced explanations to defend
              the theory of evolution in the face of the Cambrian explosion. However,
              they are unable to have these alibis accepted, even by one another.






                                             49
   46   47   48   49   50   51   52   53   54   55   56