Page 101 - Five Forces of Americanisation Richard Hooke 04072025 final post SDR1
P. 101

The UK Defence Industry in the 21  Century
                                                                        st
                                            The Five Forces of Americanisation

                     These factors, combined with poorer than expected results in 2016***, ultimately resulted in the
                     major goodwill impairment we have taken, as well as a loss of talent and capability***.…

                     The Group has many issues which require attention to reverse the current negative performance
                     trajectory*** and this is the relentless focus for every employee, starting with me. During 2016,
                     there have been a succession of performance issues in a number of Cobham businesses. These
                     have stemmed from weaknesses in management and financial controls**; contractual and
                     commercial failures and, in a few businesses, more challenging market conditions. Change
                     projects and initiatives driven from the centre have diverted focus from improving critical
                     production, operational and contract performance. These change programmes have consumed
                     significant financial resources and management energy* over a number of years with
                     disappointing outcomes
                     “The  Group’s  reporting  structures,  including  its  internal  processes  and  the  allocation  of
                     responsibilities have become overly complex and unclear*. In a number of instances, this has led
                     to duplication, reduced accountability and slow decision making***, which has contributed to the
                     period of sustained operational and financial challenges. This situation has ultimately impacted
                     employee  motivation  and  morale,  evidenced  by  Cobham’s  high  voluntary  staff  turnover**.
                     Furthermore, with hindsight, the Group may have misread the cycles within its markets and within
                     its businesses, making poorly timed acquisitions or integrating them poorly**. These acquisitions
                     appear to have amplified internal weaknesses, rather than compensated for them”

               Corporations often expect their advisers to provide guidance and, whilst Cobham’s “Excellence in
               Delivery” project was delivered by experience management consultants for six years, the company
               also had plenty of support and input from brokers, equity analysts and bankers.
               Cobham active use of bank lending (up to 40% of its total debt) to finance the business had reflected
               the  Board’s  confidence  in  continuing  revenue  growth  as  well  as  its  support  for  continuing  M&A
               activity. However, with operating cash flow falling from 2013 onwards and the huge task of bringing
               Aeroflex into the group revealing gaps in the management lineup, a revision of the Company’s financial
               policy appeared well overdue and made the board look equally in need of strengthening. Financial
               policy provides one of a company’s most basic foundations, informing management and shareholders
               alike of the company’s prudence and its attitude to risk. At a time of significant management turmoil,
               without a finance director for several months and a part time CEO in office, it ultimately required two
               Rights Issues inside two years (June 2016, April 2017) to repair the balance sheet.



               Notes
               1.  Lenders and investors generally like stability and the ability to take a reliable, preferably long-term view.
                   Ironically, investment bankers like change. Change that provides opportunities for financing or re-financing,
                   Changes like mergers, acquisitions, spin-offs and disposals, even bankruptcies. These events provide the
                   opportunity for “event-driven financing”, often accompanied by specialist advisory work. Both tend to offer
                   premium pricing.
                   When momentum has been developed relating to a possible merger or takeover, the potential for event-
                   driven advisory and financing fees makes it difficult to stop. Accordingly, Rule 2.6 of the UK Takeover Code
                   prescribes that a potential offeror, after being publicly identified, must either announce a firm intention to
                   make an offer to acquire the target company in question within 28 days, or publicly withdraw its interest.
                   This is quaintly referred to as a “PUSU”: Put Up or Shut up.
                   This is the kind of language of which John Hamre (“big hat; no cattle”) would no doubt approve.
               2.  Global Private Equity Report: March 11, 2024 (see The Five Forces of Americanisation: 5. Financial Markets)
               ________________________________________________________________





               101
               07/07/2025                                                                                                                                   Richard Hooke 2025
   96   97   98   99   100   101   102   103   104   105   106