Page 102 - Five Forces of Americanisation Richard Hooke 04072025 final post SDR1
P. 102

The UK Defence Industry in the 21  Century
                                                                        st
                                            The Five Forces of Americanisation

               Appendix 2

               CASE STUDY II
               Assessing the Value of IP as leverage: the KC-46 Air Tanker

               Cobham’s ability to remain a reliable supplier to all its customers was clearly in doubt over a protracted
               period. Clearly, the US Department of Defense (DoD) or Boeing Corporation, its prime contractor on
               the KC-46C tanker programme, played an active role in the process of overseeing or even directing
               Cobham’s performance and, ultimately, on the company’s ultimate sale.
               Having acquired the entire Cobham group a few days before Christmas, 2019, Advent finalised its sale
               of Cobham Mission Systems to US$18bn turnover US power management group, Eaton Corporation,
               barely eighteen months later, in June, 2021. It is probable that both Boeing and the US DoD would
               have found it necessary to approve the transaction. As KC-46C prime contractor, there is also no doubt
               that Boeing’s “special measures” oversight team will have been a constant presence in Cobham’s
               Mission Systems operations for the last several years. Certainly, Cobham’s Chief Executive devoted a
               great deal of his time working in the USA to resolve the difficulties. One would assume that the UK
               MoD  would  also  have  aimed  to  maintain  an  influential  oversight  role  on  Cobham’s  overall
               performance over the last decade.
               The story of the KC-46A is a remarkable commentary on the US defence procurement and fulfilment
               process: not just how it designs, develops, builds and delivers the end product of extremely lengthy,
               complex and expensive programmes into service but how dogged and determined the DoD remains
               in pursuing a successful outcome.

               The question for the UK here is whether the UK’s position on this programme constituted significant
               value that should have been preserved. Value that was not only intrinsic, in terms of the technology
               it embodied, developed over decades and supplied to the US Air Force, but also in terms of its uniquely
               critical  position  within  a  major  US  defence  system  used  in  expeditionary  warfare.  Most  likely  a
               coalition that would include the Royal Air Force.

               The following press coverage provides enlightening insight. I have reproduced Dominic Gates’ words
               up to 2019 here since, as a distinguished reporter for the Seattle Times (published in Boeing’s major
               civil aircraft manufacturing home US city) and a Pulitzer Prize winner for his coverage of the 737MAX,
               he has followed the story closely since from the outset. Although he retired in March, 2025, the author
               has contacted him for further comment, so far without reply.

               January, 2019
               “The U.S. Air Force on Thursday finally accepted and took ownership from Boeing of its first KC-46A
               air-to-air refueling (sic) tanker, though it pointed to flaws in the aircraft’s refueling (sic) systems that
               must be fixed.

               “Rather than celebrate the tanker milestone — at the end of an 18-year wait that began with a
               procurement scandal and continued through a bitterly fought political battle to wrest the contract
               away from Airbus — the Air Force issued a short statement critical of the remaining shortfalls in the
               tanker’s capability. And actual delivery of the jet to McConnell Air Force Base in Wichita, Kan., now
               three years late, is still weeks away.”
                                                 th
               (Dominic Gates, The Seattle Times, 16  January, 2019)






               102
               07/07/2025                                                                                                                                   Richard Hooke 2025
   97   98   99   100   101   102   103   104   105   106   107