Page 64 - The prevalence of the Val66Met polymorphism in musicians: Possible evidence for compensatory neuroplasticity from a pilot study

S. Si et al. NeuroImage 213 (2020) 116681
Presented at the Society for Research in Child Development. Montreal, Quebec, schizophrenia and bipolar disorder. Nature 460, 748–752. https://doi.org/10.1038/
Canada. nature08185.
Masarik, A.S., Conger, R.D., Donnellan, M.B., Stallings, M.C., Martin, M.J., Schofield, T.J., Raven, J., Raven, J.C., Court, J.H., 1998. Raven Manual Section 4: Advanced Progressive
et al., 2014. For better and for worse: genes and parenting interact to predict future Matrices. Oxford Psychologists Press, Oxford, 26 UK.
behavior in romantic relationships. J. Fam. Psychol. 28, 357–367. https://doi.org/ Reuter, M., Roth, S., Holve, K., Hennig, J., 2006. Identification of first candidate genes for
10.1037/a0036818. creativity: a pilot study. Brain Res. 1069, 190–197. https://doi.org/10.1016/
Mehrinejad, S.A., Rajabimoghadam, S., Tarsafi, M., 2015. The relationship between j.brainres.2005.11.046.
parenting styles and creativity and the predictability of creativity by parenting styles. Rogers, C.R., 1970. Towards a theory of creativity. In: Vernon, P.E. (Ed.), Creativity.
Procedia.Soc. Behav. Sci. 205, 56–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/ Penguin Books, New York, pp. 137–151.
j.sbspro.2015.09.014. Roisman, G.I., Newman, D.A., Fraley, R.C., Haltigan, J.D., Groh, A.M., Haydon, K.C.,
Mehta, D., Eapen, V., Kohlhof, J., Mendoza Diaz, A., Barnett, B., Silove, D., et al., 2016. 2012. Distinguishing differential susceptibility from diathesisstress:
Genetic regulation of maternal oxytocin response and its influences on maternal recommendations for evaluating interaction effects. Dev. Psychopathol. 24, 389–409.
behavior. Neural Plast. https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/5740365. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0954579412000065.
Miller, A.L., Lambert, A.D., Speirs Neumeister, K.L., 2012. Parenting style, perfectionism, Runco, M.A., 2004. Creativity. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 55, 657–687.
and creativity in high-ability and high-achieving young adults. J. Educ. Gift. 35, Runco, M.A., Millar, G., Acar, S., Cramond, B., 2010. Torrance tests of creative thinking as
344–365. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162353212459257. predictors of personal and public achievement: a fifty-year follow-up. Creativ. Res. J.
Mitchell, C., Notterman, D., Brooks-Gunn, J., Hobcraft, J., Mclanahan, S., 2011. Role of 22, 361–368. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2010.523393.
mother’s genes and environment in postpartum depression. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. Runco, M.A., Noble, E.P., Reiter-Palmon, R., Acar, S., Ritchie, T., Yurkovich, J.M., 2011.
Unit. States Am. 108, 8189–8193. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1014129108. The genetic basis of creativity and ideational fluency. Creativ. Res. J. 23, 376–380.
Monroe, S.M., Simons, A.D., 1991. Diathesis-stress theories in the context of life stress https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2011.621859.
research: implications for the depressive disorders. Psychol. Bull. 110, 406–425. Rutter, M, 2006. Genes and behavior: nature–nurture interplay explained. Genes, Brain
https://doi.org/10.1037//0033-2909.110.3.406. and Behavior. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1601-183x.2006.00219.x.
Mouchiroud, C., Lubart, T., 2001. Children’s original thinking: an empirical examination Sen, R.S., Sharma, N., 2013. The familial context of creativity: patterns of nurturance in
of alternative measures derived from divergent thinking tasks. J. Genet. Psychol.: Res. families of creative children. Psychol. Stud. 58, 374–385. https://doi.org/10.1007/
Theor.Hum. Dev. 162, 382–401. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221320109597491. s12646-013-0221-y.
Mozafari, S., 2014. Prediction of creativity and academic achievement based on child Si, S., Zhang, S., Yu, Q., Zhang, J., 2018. The interaction of DRD2 and parenting style in
rearing styles. Int. J.Psychol.Behav. Res. 3, 166–176. predicting creativity. Think. Skills Creativ. 27, 64–77. https://doi.org/10.1016/
Mumford, M.D., 2003. Where have we been, where are we going? Taking stock in j.tsc.2017.11.001.
creativity research. Creativ. Res. J. 15, 107–120. https://doi.org/10.1207/ Sternberg, R.J., 1999. Handbook of Creativity. Cambridge University Press, New York.
S15326934CRJ152&3_01. Sweitzer, M.M., Halder, I., Flory, J.D., Craig, A.E., Gianaros, P.J., Ferrell, R.E.,
Murphy, M., Runco, M.A., Acar, S., Reiter-Palmon, R., 2013. Reanalysis of genetic data Manuck, S.B., 2013. Polymorphic variation in the dopamine D4 receptor predicts
and rethinking dopamine’s relationship with creativity. Creativ. Res. J. 21, 147–148. delay discounting as a function of childhood socioeconomic status: evidence for
https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2013.752305. differential susceptibility. Soc. Cognit. Affect Neurosci. 8, 499–508. https://doi.org/
Nichols, R.C., 1964. Parental attitudes of mothers of intelligent adolescents and creativity 10.1093/scan/nss020.
of their children. Child Dev. 35, 1040–1049. https://doi.org/10.2307/1126851. Takeuchi, H., Tomita, H., Taki, Y., Kikuchi, Y., Ono, C., Yu, Z., Sekiguchi, A., Nouchi, R.,
Nijstad, B.A., De Dreu, C.K.W., Rietzschel, E.F., Baas, M., 2010. The dual pathway to Kotozaki, Y., Nakagawa, S., 2015. The associations among the dopamine D2 receptor
creativity model: creative ideation as a function of flexibility and persistence. Eur. Taq1, emotional intelligence, creative potential measured by divergent thinking, and
Rev. Soc. Psychol. 21, 34–77. https://doi.org/10.1080/10463281003765323. motivational state and these associations’ sex differences. Front. Psychol. 6, 912.
O’Donnell, K.J., Glover, V., Lahti, J., Lahti, M., Edgar, R.D., R€ aikk€ onen, Katri, et al., 2017. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00912.
Maternal prenatal anxiety and child comt genotype predict working memory and Voelker, P., Sheese, B.E., Rothbart, M.K., Posner, M.I., 2009. Variations in catechol-o-
symptoms of adhd. PloS One 12 (6), e0177506. https://doi.org/10.1371/ methyltransferase gene interact with parenting to influence attention in early
journal.pone.0177506. development. Neuroscience 164, 121–130. https://doi.org/10.1016/
Pearson, R., Mcgeary, J.E., Beevers, C.G., 2014. Association between serotonin j.neuroscience.2009.05.059.
cumulative genetic score and the behavioral approach system (bas): moderation by Volf, N.V., Kulikov, A.V., Bortsov, C.U., Popova, N.K., 2009. Association of verbal and
early life environment. Pers. Indiv. Differ. 70, 140–144. https://doi.org/10.1016/ figural creative achievement with polymorphism in the human serotonin transporter
j.paid.2014.06.041. gene. Neurosci. Lett. 463, 154–157. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neulet.2009.07.070.
Plucker, J.A., 1999. Is the proof in the pudding? Reanalyses of Torrance’s (1958 to Zabelina, D.L., Colzato, L., Beeman, M., Hommel, B., 2016. Dopamine and the creative
present) longitudinal data. Creativity Res. J. 12, 103–114. https://doi.org/10.1207/ mind: individual differences in creativity are predicted by interactions between
s15326934crj1202_3. dopamine genes DAT and COMT. PloS One 11, e0146768. https://doi.org/10.1371/
Pluess, M., Belsky, J., 2013. Vantage sensitivity: individual differences in response to journal.pone.0146768.
positive experiences. Psychol. Bull. 139, 901–916. https://doi.org/10.1037/ Zhang, S., Zhang, J.H., 2017. The association of TPH genes with creative potential.
a0030196. Psychol. Aesthet. Creat. Arts 11, 2–9. https://doi.org/10.1037/aca0000073.
Power, R.A., Steinberg, S., Bjornsdottir, G., Rietveld, C.A., Abdellaoui, A., Nivard, M.M., Zhang, S., Zhang, M., Zhang, J., 2014a. An exploratory study on drd2 and creative
Johannesson, M., Galesloot, T.E., Hottenga, J.J., Willemsen, G., Cesarini, D., potential. Creativ. Res. J. 26, 115–123. https://doi.org/10.1080/
Benjamin, D.J., Magnusson, P.K., Ullen, F., Tiemeier, H., Hofman, A., van Rooij, F.J., 10400419.2014.874267.
Walters, G.B., Sigurdsson, E., Thorgeirsson, T.E., Ingason, A., Helgason, A., Kong, A., Zhang, S., Zhang, M., Zhang, J., 2014b. Association of COMT and COMT-DRD2
Kiemeney, L.A., Koellinger, P., Boomsma, D.I., Gudbjartsson, D., Stefansson, H., interaction with creative potential. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 8, 216. https://doi.org/
Stefansson, K., 2015. Polygenic risk scores for schizophrenia and bipolar disorder 10.3389/fnhum.2014.00216.
predict creativity. Nat. Neurosci. 18, 953–955. https://doi.org/10.1038/nn.4040. Zhang, J., Han, X., Si, S., Zhang, S., 2018. The interaction of TPH1 A779C polymorphism
Purcell, S.M., Wray, N.R., Stone, J.L., Visscher, P.M., O’Donovan, M.C., Sullivan, P.F., and maternal authoritarianism on creative potential. Front. Psychol. 9, 2106. https://
Sklar, P, et al., 2009. Common polygenic variation contributes to risk of doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02106.

11