Page 189 - C:\Users\uromn\Videos\seyyedi pdf\
P. 189

S.A. Seyyedi et al.                                                   Photodiagnosis and Photodynamic Therapy 49 (2024) 104282
         recurrence of RHL [23,24]. Application of PBM on patients with recur-  The lesion size was determined by measuring the two main diameters
         rent herpes simplex infection shown to decrease the recurrence fre-  of the lesion in square millimeters using a transparent graph paper and
         quency of herpes labialis [23]. Another study found significant  graded in range of 0 to 3 (grade 0: no lesion, grade 1: 0.1 to 2.0 mm,
         reduction of remission frequency in patients with recurrent herpes  grade 2: 2–5 mm, and grade 3: larger than 5 mm). The pain intensity was
         simplex infection [24]. On contrary, laser irradiation in a murine model  evaluated based on the visual analogue scale (VAS), which 0 represented
         did not affect stablished herpes simplex virus latency [25].  no pain and 10 represented the most severe pain ever experienced. At
           Despite available body of evidence, the question of usefulness of PBM  the first session, the lesion size before treatment and pain intensity
         on herpes simplex virus infections treatment parameters (recurrence,  before and right after treatment were evaluated by an oral medicine
         symptoms severity, etc.) remains to be determined. In this study, we  specialist.
         aimed to evaluate the effect of PBM in the treatment of RHL. Our null  Patients attended in follow-up sessions. In each follow-up the
         hypothesis is that PBM has no synergistic effect on clinical outcomes of  researcher described the VAS criteria (Fig. 1) clearly to the patients, and
         acyclovir in patients with recurrent herpes labialis  then asked them to grade the pain intensity accordingly.
                                                                 According to Shapiro Wilk test showed that all data has been nor-
         1.1. Method and material                             mally distributed (p > 0.05). Data were analyzed by independent T-Test
                                                              and Chi-square (at a significance level of 0.05) by SPSS-21.0 software
           The present study was a parallel double-blind randomized controlled  (IBM, SPSS, Chicago, USA).
         study. The study protocol was conducted according to the declaration of
         1964-helsinki and was approved by Urmia University of Medical Sci-  2. Results
         ences ethical committee IR.UMSU.REC.1400.048). The study protocol
         has also been registered and evaluated at Iranian Registry of Clinical  22 patients with symptomatic RHL participated in the study A con-
         Trials  (available  at:  https://www.irct.ir/;  registration  ID:  sort flowchart was illustrated in Fig. 2. 12 patients (54.4%) were women
         IRCT20180224038840N2).                               and mean age was 27.5 ± 7.08 years old.
           Patients over 18 years old with a history of RHL and at least one  As Table 1 shows, the t-test demonstrated that the mean pain score
         lesion in vesicular stage at the time of the study were included in the  based on VAS was not significantly different between the two groups,
         study. Patients with acute systemic diseases like diabetes mellitus and  before treatment, right after, and the first day after treatment (p = 0.43,
         immunosuppression and other oral lesions at crust stage, smokers,  p = 0.55, and p = 0.12, respectively). On the second and third day after
         allergic reaction to acyclovir and taking anti-inflammatory and anti-  treatment, the Acyclovir + PBM group had significantly lower mean
         biotic medications were excluded. Biopsies were taken from lesions and  pain score than the Acyclovir group without PBM (p < 0.001 both days)
         cultivated to confirm viral infection by virologist All data were collected  (Fig. 3).
         from patients referred to lasers clinic in Urmia during 2019 to 2021.  The chi-square test showed that there was no significant difference
           Sample size was calculated using G”Power software based on mean  between the groups in terms of frequency of various grades of lesions
         and STD of pain intensity values of previous studies [26]. Each group  size before treatment, first day, and third day after treatment (p = 0.45, p
         consisted of 12 patients and the final sample size was 24 patients and  = 0.28, and p = 0.69, respectively) (Table 2). It is worth mentioning
         two patients are missing during follow-ups led to final 22 patients. All  that, in acyclovir with PBM group, high grade of lesions size was less
         patients were informed of study protocol and signed informed consent  frequent than acyclovir without PBM group, seventh and tenth day after
         form before including in the study. Each patient was labeled with a code  treatment (p = 0.03 and p = 0.001 respectively) (Table 2).
         Randomization was conducted using toss and coin method. The patients  The mean recovery time (day) was 8.7 ± 1.5 in the acyclovir whit
         and outcomes investigators were blinded of group allocations  PBM, 10.5 ± 1.1 in the turned-off laser group, and 3.4 ± 1.142 in the
         (double-blind).                                      acyclovir group, which showed a statistically significant difference (p =
           All the diagnosis and treatment processes were performed by an oral  0.005).
         medicine specialist. Participants were randomly divided into two  As results yield, the patients in the acyclovir with PBM group
         groups. The first group was case group receiving acyclovir cream (5 %  compared to the other group patient were more satisfied whit their
         five times a day for five days) along with PBMT as a case. The second  treatment method (p = 0.008) (Table 3).
         group was control group receiving acyclovir cream with passive laser.
         Both groups were sex and age-matched. Each group consisted of 12  3. Discussion
         patients.
           Patients received PBM (Konf™- Konftec Corporation, Taiwan), (in  The aim of herpes virus management is mainly symptomatic,
         the vesicular phase of herpes lesions. PBM was conducted by mean of a  focusing on clinical pain and lesion size [4]. Gold Standard of treatment
         100 mW, semi-conductor diode laser (InGaAsP) with wavelength of 940  is Acyclovir, while low absorption rate is its main limitation [13]. This
                              2
         ±10 nm and fluence of 4 J/cm . Laser irradiation was performed in one  study was aimed to determine the effect of PBMT in the treatment of
         session in the first 24 to 48 h after the lesion. The spot size was 0.5 cm 2  recurrent herpes labialis. Our main focus was on the vesicular stage of
         and the irritation duration was 20 s [23]. The output was recorded as a  the disease which is the most apparent clinical stage of the lesion. Ac-
         parameters displayed at the device. In order to minimized the risk of  cording to our results in postoperative 48 and 72 h, pain intensity in the
         laser scattering, no protective film was used. Instead, the probe was
         disinfected with alcohol. It should be noted that the protective eyewear
         was used for the safety of patients, dentists, and dental assistants.
           The Acyclovir without PBM group were treated by the same regimen
         of acyclovir cream and diode laser while the device was turned off. The
         patients were instructed how to use the topical acyclovir cream. Ac-
         cording to instructions, the cream was applied five times a day for five
         days. The process involves, washing hands, cleaning and drying skin and
         applying cream without any extra pressure. This process repeated every
         four hours.
           All treatment procedures were conducted by a fellowship of laser,
         while measuring outcomes was conducted by a oral medicine specialist
         which was not familiar by type of treatment.          Fig. 1. Visual analogue scale used in the study to assess the pain intensity.

                                                            2
   184   185   186   187   188   189   190   191   192   193   194