Page 37 - World Airnews Magazine February 2020 Edition
P. 37

HUMAN            HUMAN
 FACTORS          FACTORS


 WHAT IS A JUST CULTURE?  portunity to learn from their mistakes and leads to potential problems
           Such a ‘blame and shame’ culture does not afford individuals the op-


         being hidden.
           In certain organisations, one can find that perception is driven by



 A buzzword in aviation human factors circles,   ‘Group Think’. The sad fact is that when lost in a crowd, average indi-
 By Eon de Vos  viduals can become exceptionally virtuous or deadly. Their behaviour

         depends on how they believe they are expected to act.
           “It is never redundant to stress that human behaviour does not take

         place in a vacuum. Corporate culture is an organisational mandate
         which conditions decision making, and humans exhibit the kinds of


         behaviours the organisation fosters and which they therefore assume

         the organisation expects from them”.   (Merrit et al)
                                      4
           Any negative event elicits speculation about where the blame lies.



         We still look for a scapegoat when confronted with an accident or
         incident with no immediately apparent solution as to its cause.

           To quote Kenneth Quinn:
           The best way to honour victims of a tragedy is to make sure we
         obtain all relevant information that might prevent future acci-
         dents. If individuals are not helpful to investigators out of fear of
         being prosecuted and sent to jail, investigators may never discover
         the truth. Stated differently, we found that the risk that the threat
         of criminal prosecution places on the future safety of air travel
         greatly outweighs any societal benefit in satisfying the inherent
         human desire for revenge or punishment in the wake of a terrible
         loss.    (My emphasis).
             5
           This ‘inherent human desire for revenge or punishment’ leads to the
         downfall of our envisaged Just Culture.
           As draconian as lethal retribution might seem; science has shown

         that the human brain can take pleasure in certain kinds of revenge.

         Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans have revealed that thinking
         about revenge activates the reward centre - where the feel-good neu-


         rotransmitter dopamine is lodged- in much the same way that sweet
         foods or even drugs can.  6
           It appears that our fascination with finding a scapegoat and assign-


         ing blame is rooted in our genes!
           Our problem is further exacerbated by the phenomenon of social


         media and citizen journalism. Suffice to say that if bots and trolls could



         influence presidential elections, social media could well influence pub-


         lic perceptions of aviation incidents and accidents. Boeing and the FAA


         recently learnt this lesson the hard way, with their delayed response
         to the Max disasters, and we only have to peruse the many internet
         aviation forums to see how the scapegoat is still sought for each and


 tween acceptable and unacceptable behaviour lies.     every situation.
 3

 Dekker (2009) explains that the issue of who draws such a line is   Should those in positions of power believe that their duty entails





 ccording to ICAO: “A healthy Just Culture plays a vital   critical, given the relative nature of perceptions of justice and fair-  the relentless pursuit of any misdemeanours, punishing those who (in





 Arole in a successful safety culture by encouraging em-  ness. This relativism makes it difficult to define justice and fairness,   their opinion) are to blame - then we very quickly end up with a blame

 ployees to report safety incidents and hazardous conditions. This   and consequently, just culture.  and punish culture, one which I propose was and is currently still







 information enables the proactive identification of safety-related   For our aviation purposes Just Culture can be considered a realis-  active in our aviation environment.







 problems and allows for the identification of safety trends. A criti-  tic and effective compromise between the extremes of blame and   The answer is to ‘walk the Just Culture talk’ and for companies and


 cal part of Just Culture is also the responsibility to be consistently   no-blame.   regulators to react appropriately to pilots’ and employees’ reports.

 intolerant of wilful misconduct or reckless behaviour. Adopting a   IS THE REQUIREMENT OF A CLEARLY DEFINED LINE BETWEEN   This would allow pilots and crew to feel empowered to report issues
 clearly defined Just Culture policy and programme will benefit the   ACCEPTABLE AND UNACCEPTABLE BEHAVIOUR SATISFIED IN   and then we may eventually achieve that elusive Just Culture. Q



 safety management of each aviation organization.”     CONTEMPORARY AVIATION? ARE WE ACHIEVING THE RE-

 1
 But whether it could actually be achieved is debatable.  QUIREMENTS OF TRUST, LEARNING AND ACCOUNTABILITY?
 Feedback by pilots from a variety of airlines, as reported during   REFERENCES
 ‘Justice’ and ‘Fair Play’ are human constructs - abstract concepts   CRM courses presented by the author, indicates a clear perception   1.  https://www.icao.int/Meetings/a39/Documents/WP/wp_193_en.pdf ICAO




 created through human imagination. For example, Plato, Aristotle,   among air crew that Just Culture is more myth than reality.  Working Paper Improving Just Culture

 John Locke and John Rawls - all from different centuries, present   When pilots refrain from reporting technical or procedural snags,   2.  Dekker, S.W.A., 2009. Just culture: Who gets to draw the line? Cogn. Tech-




 divergent philosophical discussions on the nature of ‘Justice’.   because they fear being victimised (even fired), that is when we   nol. Work 11, 177–185. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10111-008-0110-7




 Justice is thus very much in the eye of the beholder – open to   find serious problems are swept under the carpet - with potentially   3.  James Reason (1998) Achieving a safe culture: Theory and practice, Work


            & Stress: An International Journal of Work, Health & Organisations, 12:3,


 manipulation and misinterpretation.  disastrous results.   293-306, DOI:10.1080/02678379808256868


 In our frequent CRM discussions with aircrew from many differ-


 HOW TO DEFINE JUST CULTURE IN AVIATION?   ent airlines, fear of retribution often surfaces as the reason for in-  4.  Helmreich, Robert & Merritt, Ashleigh & Wilhelm, John. Error and resource
            management across organizational, professional, and national cultures.






 According to Dekker (2009), Just Culture is a culture of trust, learning   hibited reporting – note that this perception often does not reflect   5.  Quinn, K.P., 2007. Battling Accident Criminalization. AeroSafety world 2,




 and accountability.  2  the true situation, but perceptions drive people’s reality. Thus, we   11–14.






 Reason (1998) states that a prerequisite for just culture is   find that many situations with potentially lethal consequences are   6.  McCullough, M., 2008. Beyond revenge: The evolution of the forgiveness

            instinct, 1st edition. ed. Jossey-Bass.

 a clear awareness among all personnel of where the line be-  simply not reported.
 World Airnews | February 2020  World Airnews | February 2020  World Airnews | February 2020
 — 34 —                          — 35 —                    — 35 —
   32   33   34   35   36   37   38   39   40   41   42